Login
Create Account

Do you have a Facebook account?

Online:1 Month Ago Name:- Private -
Updated:1 Year Ago Gender:Male
Joined:3 Years Ago Birthday:- Private -
President:Not Saying Email:- Private -
Ideology:Conservative Education:High School
Party:Undecided Ethnicity:White
Relationship:Single Income:Not Saying
Interested:No Answer Occupation:Self-Employed
Looking:Networking Religion:Christian
About Me:I'm a philosopher by trait and a human by nature. To think well and to live well is to fulfill what I am supposed to be. And what I ultimately live for is to honor the God in whom my entire being is constantly dependent and properly directed to. Only one truth can direct me to the righteous path and only one truth I defend, the truth that sets me free in Christ.
Activities:Internet Marketing, Web Design, Photoshop, Philosophizing, Debating, Existing, Video Editing, and Unhealthy Computer Consumption.
Beliefs:Essentialism, Aristotelian Realism, A-Theory, Natural Law, Virtue Ethics, Christian Theism, Hylemorophic Dualism, Libertarian Free Will, Molinism, and Capitalism.
Movies:Lord of the Rings, Inception, Black Knight, Narnia, Spiderman, Pirates of the Caribbean, and Harry Potter.
Music:Rock, Metal, Industrial, Trance and Techno.
5 Debates

The Universe's Existence is Explicable

BruteApologia
CGBSpender

I will defend the proposition that the universe as an existing "whole" can be thought to more plausibly have an explanation for its existence than its negation. In other words, is it more plausible to think that there is an explanation for why the universe exists or should we think the universe to more plausibly have no explanation for its existence? This is not a debate on what that explanation is (e.g, the necessity of the universe, God, multiverses, etc) but on what is in principle more epi...

Post Voting Period
36 Comments
Updated 1 Year Ago

There are no compelling arguments against same-sex marriage

Pangloss
BruteApologia

The issue of same-sex marriage is one which divides not only the United States, but much of the Western world.[1] What is most remarkable about this matter is not the lack of agreement, but rather the lack of strong arguments against same-sex marriage. There are simply no compelling arguments (legal, political, or moral) against same-sex marriage. (While there may be religious arguments against it, I would prefer only to address arguments that do not assume a belief in the supernatural and/or th...

Post Voting Period
104 Comments
Updated 2 Years Ago

Evolutionary Theory Can Adequately Account For An Objective Morality

Dimmitri.C
BruteApologia

In the past to this point in time in history a great number of questions have been asked and answered by philosophers and scientists. However ever great those questions have been, no other question is more relevantly practical than the question being asked in the field of evolutionary ethics by scientists and philosophers. Namely, can evolutionary ethics amalgamate and synthesize the ever so distant gap between philosophy and the natural sciences. The main contention of this debate will be the m...

Post Voting Period
13 Comments
Updated 2 Years Ago

The Universe's Existence is Explicable

BruteApologia
Hopeliveson

In this debate I will support the notion that "The Universe's Existence Is Explicable" -- in other words, it is more plausible to think that the universe has an explanation than its negation. What this explanation is is irrelevant to the metaphysical question of whether the universe can be plausibly thought to have an explanation at all. The opponent may either take the offensive position of disproving my arguments and/or provide reasons for why the universe is an exception to explicability thro...

Voting Period
18 Comments
Updated 2 Years Ago

The Argument from Meaning

BruteApologia
TheNoblePolemic

I'd like to begin by thanking my opponent for accepting this debate. We'll be discussing whether the argument from meaning successfully justifies God's existence. My opponent will be arguing that it does not. He is someone I greatly respect as a fellow Christian philosopher and I am very pleased that he took the time to debate this issue with a second-rate philosopher such as myself. This argument has not been presented in any scholarly journal or book that I know of but was originally developed...

Voting Period
13 Comments
Updated 3 Years Ago
BruteApologia
Debates:5
Lost:0
Tied:0
Won:5
Win Ratio:100.00%
Percentile:94.19%
Elo Ranking:2,491
Forum Posts:20
Votes Cast:22
Opinion Arguments:0
Opinion Questions:0
BruteApologia has not added any photo albums.
Disagree: 0.00%
Agree: 0.00%
Abortion
Affirmative ActionN/S
Animal RightsN/S
Barack ObamaN/S
Border FenceN/S
CapitalismN/S
Civil UnionsCon
Death Penalty
Drug LegalizationCon
Electoral CollegeN/S
Environmental ProtectionN/S
Estate TaxN/S
European UnionN/S
Euthanasia
Federal ReserveN/S
Flat TaxN/S
Free TradeN/S
Gay MarriageCon
Global Warming ExistsN/S
GlobalizationN/S
Gold StandardN/S
Gun RightsN/S
HomeschoolingN/S
Internet CensorshipN/S
Iran-Iraq WarN/S
Labor UnionN/S
Legalized ProstitutionN/S
Medicaid & MedicareN/S
Medical MarijuanaN/S
Military InterventionN/S
Minimum WageN/S
National Health CareN/S
National Retail Sales TaxN/S
Occupy MovementN/S
Progressive TaxN/S
Racial ProfilingN/S
RedistributionN/S
Smoking BanN/S
Social ProgramsN/S
Social SecurityN/S
SocialismN/S
Stimulus SpendingN/S
Term LimitsN/S
TortureN/S
United NationsN/S
War in AfghanistanN/S
War on TerrorN/S
WelfareN/S