The Father Should Not Have Say In an Abortion.
As PRO, I will be affirming this resolution by arguing that the decision should rest entirely on the mother.
As CON, you will attempt to negate the resolution by arguing that the father should have equal and/or greater say in the decision.
Burden Of Proof
i will be arguing that intellectual property rights in the US should be abolished and my opponent will be arguing the opposite
do not make arguments in the first round
1st round for acceptance 2nd ill provide the situation the stupid question was asked...
Con would argue, "The words 'Under God' should not be in the Pledge of Allegiance."
Pro would argue, "The words 'Under God' should be in the Pledge of Allegiance."
There would be a shared burden of proof.
"Should" as in whether or not it is legal and/or appropriate to have.
Thanks to whoever accepts, and good luck. :)
This is a quote by Margaret Sanger, commenting on the 'Negro Project' in a letter to Dr. Clarence Gamble, December 10, 1939: "We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don"t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs...
We will debate battles for different wars and time periods. What happens is that every round a battle will be placed by each person. The voters will decide who has the more important battle for t...
Con will argue for the continuation of the "war on drugs"
I will argue for the legalization of Marijuana on the grounds that the prohibition of drugs is not a deterrent, Marijuana is less dangerous than cigarettes and alcohol, the drug war costs too much money for its own good, and drug prohibition invades civil liberties
Con will provide arguments to support the war on drugs
According to the preamble of the Constitution, the Constitution was established to secure the blessings of liberty to our posterity. Killing an unborn person in the womb is directly contrary to this idea. All people have equal rights under the Constitution, including unborn persons....
Because of the notoriety that the phrase "illegal guns" has reached, I would like to initiate this debate where I will point out why I believe that the responsibility of legal gun owners concerning the safety of their guns should not end with their losing control of their weapons. In short, they should be hold accountable for any crime committed with their lost gun even though they have reported it lost and regardless of who the perpetrator is. Welcome to this debate! Good luck!...
The position I will be defending is that not only technical and mechanical features of rifles merit consideration for their classification, but also their appearances. Hunting rifles are excluded from the debate. Debating this topic will help people decide what guns should fall under the assault rifle category. Good luck!...