|Online:||3 Years Ago||Name:||- Private -|
|Updated:||4 Years Ago||Gender:||Male|
|Joined:||6 Years Ago||Birthday:||- Private -|
|President:||Not Saying||Email:||- Private -|
|Relationship:||Not Saying||Income:||Less than $25,000|
|Looking:||No Answer||Religion:||Christian - Catholic|
|About Me:||Fiery, brazen, opinionated, extremely handsome haha.|
|Activities:||Football, Soccer, Paintball|
|Beliefs:||Realistic. Do what needs to be done to protect Americans, the rest of the world comes secondary.|
|Quotes:||History will be kind to me, for I intend to write it.|
I would like to take Demosthenes for taking this debate. I look forward to debating about the future of Tim Tebow's career in the NFL, or perhaps lack thereof from your perspective. I am new to debates since this is my first official one so please bear with me. I would like to start off by saying that Tim Tebow will be an NFL quarterback within the next 3 years. We are not debating whether or not he will be a great qb in the nfl, but merely good enough to be a starter. I am not sure if...
This will be my first debate, so I would like to open by inviting whoever takes up the Con position to politely correct my protocol if necessary. First, I submit the following limiting parameter for the debate: The referees called the game in a completely impartial manner. No calls were made which were blatantly incorrect, therefore the outcome of any particular reviewed play is not admissible as evidence to attempt to disprove my position. Furthermore, it is assumed that any penalties co...
Private entities ought to be able to discriminate based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin without hassle from government or law enforcement. I am not interested in a semantics debate. If any confusion regarding the resolution exists please ask about it in the comments section and I will clarify. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. In recent times and times past people have taken private...
Hello, my first debate here, so play nice. I believe that Israel is not justified in their recent invasion of Gaza. My definition of justified is a reasonable response for the actions taken against it. A few reasons are as follows. 1. Israel's response is massively disproportionate to the actions taken against it. I am not saying that I have the answers for the middle east conflict, although I do believe that diplomacy is the only realistic solution. This can be most clearly outlined in...
As a rule, I try not to pick winners after just a few primaries. However, I can't help but notice that Barack Obama, when he wins, wins very convincingly. First, the 8% victory over Hillary Clinton in Iowa. Who'd think that a black man, even in today's age of tolerance, would defeat a southern white man whose stated goal was to fight for the middle class (Edwards), or the Clinton political machine? I certainly didn't. Then, the public beating issued by Obama to Hillary in South Carolina....
|Statistics based on completed debates.|
This list identifies where Demosthenes stands on popular issues. The choices are limited to the following:
- N/O - No Opinion
- N/S - Not Saying
- Und - Undecided
- Con - Against
- Pro - In Favor
You can also click each issue to find other members that agree with Demosthenes' position on the issue.
|•||Global Warming Exists||N/O|
|•||Medicaid & Medicare||Pro|
|•||National Health Care||Con|
|•||National Retail Sales Tax||Pro|
|•||War in Afghanistan||Pro|
|•||War on Terror||Pro|