 |
Derek.Gunn's Debates
  |
beatles most influencial band of all time
the beatles is the most influencial and commercially succesfulband of all time! they sold over more than a billion records!! i dont rly think i a much to say but wait for a contendor...
American must agressive pursue renewable energy sources for automobiles.
In the Seventies the United States reached "Peak Oil" Production. That incident resulted in the long gas lines of the seventies. We are now or has approached the "Peak Oil" production for the world supply of oil. As the sources, production and location of new oil diminishes the price of oil will continue to rise. As the price of oil rises at a very high rate, our economy suffers. The price of oil presently effects almost everything in economy. Food distribution, fertilizers for food, ret...
RUSSIA.A danger to the united states.
Russia is a danger to the united states because russia has almost the same power as the united states.we are in danger of a nuclear war.we have the same power as russia.we are facing a problem with russia.Georgia is in peace with usa.russia is comunist.and we can even start WORLD WAR 3.......
Wikipedia is a Good Source to Use while Debating
I will just start out with something small to begin with and let my opponent begin with bringing up other points. Really, WIkipedia is not a valid source to use while debating because anybody can go on and change information. That's it. The information can seem real, but actually be completely the opposite of what you thought. Other sites like www.abcnews.com and other sites that are professional and viewers cannot change info. Thank you and I await my opponents response! :) ~Slammin...
There Is No Such Thing as an Agnostic.
The issue I am debating is of this atheist/agnostic debacle. While most people contend that atheists and agnostics are two separated positions, some atheists such as myself contend that agnostics are really just atheists. In other words, agnosticism is a "cop-out" for atheism. I believe that one of the biggest problems is with the definition of "atheist". Most people state that an atheist is one who does not believe god exists. However, I would contend that a more accurate definition of a...
commercialization of sports is the way
sports mean fun. commercialisation of sports has not only bought the game but also the sportsmen. all big multinational companies have a say in the functioning of the sports authorities. SPORTSMEN HAVE THEIR OWN BRAND ENDORSEMENT. seems that they need to do modelling rather than sports. take sania mirza for example- won a single event and everyone made her the apple of their eye. result- failure. doing advertisements had become her job rather than playing tennis. commercialization just disturbs...
mediascoop-crime reporting is sesitizing or sensationaling
what ever the media is doing they are doind to make a sensation not to sensitize the people . let's take the case of arushi murder case . before the police declared that it was arushi's father who commiyed the crime the media made a whole mess out of it . this is just one among other examples...
If your mum asks Mr. Glitter to be your babysitter, hit her!
At time of writing, former glam-rock star, Gary "Do you want to be in my cell, my cell, oh yeah" Glitter, is on his way to Hong Kong from Bangkok, having been deported from Vietnam after serving two years and nine months in prison for molesting little girls. http://edition.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/asiapcf/08/20/glitter.thailand/index.html He didn't want to get his connecting flight back to London because he suspected (probably rightly) that there will be a mob of outraged people - all baying for...
Global Warming is a greater threat to life than Nuclear War
Nuclear War may never happen. Global Warming is already happening. Nuclear missiles would primarily impact very specific military targets and concentrated industrial centres. Global warming affects the entire planet. Nagasaki and Hiroshima recovered quickly, vegetation blossoming - even around the epicentres - within months.(1) It took us over 100 years to add greenhouse gasses to the atmosphere and oceans to cause the change we are now seeing. It will a long time to reduce our emission...
A debate on a topic that I am not mentioning in the topic line.
Alright, to kill the suspense, the topic is "Global Warming is caused by mankind's actions." I negate of course. Since PRO has the burden, I'll let him go first....