|Online:||8 Months Ago||Name:||- Private -|
|Updated:||1 Year Ago||Gender:||Male|
|Joined:||1 Year Ago||Birthday:||- Private -|
|President:||Not Saying||Email:||- Private -|
|Ideology:||Not Saying||Education:||Not Saying|
|Party:||Not Saying||Ethnicity:||Not Saying|
|Relationship:||Not Saying||Income:||Not Saying|
|Interested:||No Answer||Occupation:||Not Saying|
The first round will be for acceptance. I ask for the following things: -Lincoln-Douglas format: Value/Criterion -Definitions -Statistics I don't necessarily want my opponent's grammar to be perfect, but I do want it to be understandable. Thank you, I'm looking forward to this debate....
In this debate there is not really any pro and con, but rather two different opinions being contended...
This has become an annoying factor to most LD debates I do on here. I run a case that functions on something other than a value/criterion pair, and I will always hit this argument:"LD is, over all, a value debate. Since my opponent doesn't have a value, he cannot win."I find this claim to be of absolute lunacy, and I challenge those who hold this belief to debate me on this. First round is acceptance only. I will accept the burden of proof for this debate. All definitions will come in...
The first round is acceptance (this is a joke debate) Pro burden- The pro should lose Con burden-The con should lose...
|Statistics based on completed debates.|
This list identifies where Flounder stands on popular issues. The choices are limited to the following:
- N/O - No Opinion
- N/S - Not Saying
- Und - Undecided
- Con - Against
- Pro - In Favor
You can also click each issue to find other members that agree with Flounder's position on the issue.
|||Global Warming Exists||N/S|
|||Medicaid & Medicare||N/S|
|||National Health Care||N/S|
|||National Retail Sales Tax||N/S|
|||War in Afghanistan||N/S|
|||War on Terror||N/S|