|Online:||1 Year Ago||Name:||- Private -|
|Updated:||1 Year Ago||Gender:||Female|
|Joined:||1 Year Ago||Birthday:||- Private -|
|President:||Not Saying||Email:||- Private -|
|Relationship:||- Private -||Income:||Not Saying|
|Interested:||- Private -||Occupation:||- Private -|
|Looking:||- Private -||Religion:||Pastafarian|
|About Me:||Started University debating this year and want to get better.|
Each round my opponent and I will submit a rock song from 1960-1969 with a video link and a short description of the song. House of the Rising Sun by The Animals http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZxYGeTV6fCw This song was released on the 18th June, 1964 by British "blues-inspired rock" band The Animals. This song was not written by The Animals, it was apparently taken from an old English folk song then brought to America and reworded. The reason this rendition deserves a place as one of the best...
The burden of proof in this debate falls on PRO. PRO wins if they can prove something in the Bible to be a contradiction.CON wins if PRO is unable to do so.By the Bible I mean: Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy, Joshua, Judges, Ruth, 1 Samuel, 2 Samuel, 1 Kings, 2 Kings, 1 Chronicles, 2 Chronicles, Ezra, Nehemiah, Esther, Job, Psalm, Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of Solomon, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Lamentations, Ezekiel, Daniel, Hosea, Joel, Amos, Obadiah, Jonah, Micah, Nahum, Habakkuk,...
Motion: THW make adoption compulsory for all couples legally allowed to adopt under the status quo. Rounds 1 = acceptance 2 = arguments and rebuttal 3 = rebuttal and summation (no new case points) Rules This debate is set up in line with British Parliamentary debating (Pro British government, Con Opposition party). As pro I get to set the mechanism of the debate and the definitions. For this debate I would prefer it if only a small amount of sources are used and only used to back up...
Motion:THW make adoption compulsory for all couples legally allowed to adopt under the status quo. Since Bluesteel and I have both agreed to debate this I will use the same rules as the original debate. http://www.debate.org/debates/Adoption/1/ For any voters who are still concerned about how they should vote: there is no change to the voting system. I look forward to a good debate....
The show toddlers and tiaras should not be considered child abuse. The little girls love doing the pageants and winning, and as long as they're happy with what they're doing its fine. Make up doesn't hurt, nor does spray tans or dresses. It's okay to do all of this to your child, as long as your comfortable with it and your child is. there is no abuse happening on the show. All they do is dress up and do a pageant. Everyone does beauty pageants when they're older so theres no difference in start...
|Statistics based on completed debates.|
This list identifies where Fluer stands on popular issues. The choices are limited to the following:
- N/O - No Opinion
- N/S - Not Saying
- Und - Undecided
- Con - Against
- Pro - In Favor
You can also click each issue to find other members that agree with Fluer's position on the issue.
|||Global Warming Exists||Pro|
|||Medicaid & Medicare||Pro|
|||National Health Care||N/S|
|||National Retail Sales Tax||Pro|
|||War in Afghanistan||Und|
|||War on Terror||Und|