This debate will start in Round 2; Round 1 is for acceptance only.
Good luck, 16kadams.
The topic is as follows: The Egyptian pyramids are a product of intelligent design Pro will argue that the pyramids were designed and created by people or otherwise in an intelligent, conscious way I will be rejecting the notion that any intelligence was involved with the creation of the pyramids. I believe that the pyramids evolved into their current form over thousands of years, without the help of any intelligent, conscious beings at all....
Aliens = Extraterrestrial life (from the Latin words: extra ("beyond", or "not of") and terrestris ("of or belonging to Earth")) is defined as life...
- Protect Property Rights
- Minimal tax collection for other 3 points purely
- Law enforcement
- Military defense
1. The burden of proof is on pro.
2. First round is for acceptance.
Complex intelligence is only a bi-product of a complex brain, so a complex intelligence existing without a biological brain doesn't make much sense. Expecting anyone to believe there is a complex intelligence that didn't come from a brain, is like expecting someone to believe you have a wooden chair that didn't come from a tree. I haven't seen any examples of any wood that didn't come from a tree, so it's not logical to assume that what the person is saying is true. There is no evidence that co...
Resolved: Isaiah 53 does not refer to Jesus.
Burden of proof is on me to show that it cannot refer to Jesus.
Good luck :-)
A federal government mandate making it illegal to pump your own gas would be a good way to improve the economy New Jersey and Oregon are the only two states where you already do not pump your own gas. So the federal mandate would be applied as these two states apply theirs. I will allow my opponent to accept the debate and then I'll make my arguments...
Resolved, the government of the United States of America should not recognize the recent election results in Nicaragua. Namely the election of Daniel Ortega. First round acceptance; rounds 2 & 3 arguments....
- Once saved always saved.
- Once in grace always in grace.
I will be arguing for the truth behind eternal security. In other words I will be arguing that once someone is saved according to the Christian doctrine of being born again (accepting Jesus as Lord and Savior and by acknowledging his resurrection of body and soul in atonement for our sins) then they can never again lose or forfeit it.