|Online:||9 Hours Ago||Name:||- Private -|
|Updated:||2 Weeks Ago||Gender:||Male|
|Joined:||4 Years Ago||Birthday:||- Private -|
|President:||Not Saying||Email:||- Private -|
|Relationship:||Married||Income:||$75,000 to $100,000|
|About Me:||I am a George Fox University Biblical Studies / Writing and Literature graduate. I love discussing religion. I am a nondenominational protestant member (though I attend a Baptist Church). I am attending George Fox to obtain my Master of arts Theological studies.|
|Activities:||Bowling, Martial Arts, Running, Soccer, Weight Lifting|
|Beliefs:||I am a Christian Independent(however I am a registered republican) who strongly disagrees with far left policies. I prefer debating religious topics considering that is the focus of my studies. I am a reformed Arminian who disagrees with every letter in TULIP. I do not believe in inerrancy of scripture but rather infallibility. Jesus is the Son of God, who truly died and was truly raised. I believe in the Trinity and that Hell is eternal.|
|Quotes:||"What we do in this life, echoes in eternity" - Gladiator|
George Fox University, Undergraduate Class of 2005
Newberg, Oregon, United States
Sherwood High School, Class of 2005
Sherwood, Oregon, United States
Brian Griffin is a fictional character on the show Family Guy. On the show he is known for being an atheist. I will argue that his being so contradicts past experiences of his over the show's course.===Rules===1. Drops will count as concessions.2. Semantic or abusive arguments will not be counted.3. New arguments brought in the last round will not be counted.4. R1 is for acceptance/clarification. Argumentation begins in R2.5. BoP is shared between Pro and Con.===Sources=== http://familyguy...
Go by popular definitions.First round is acceptance. ...
God in this debate, will be defined in two ways:(i) The omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent creator of the universe(ii) The divine author of moral authority If either (i) or (ii) fail, then the resolution has been affirmed. If one of the aspects of God fail, then God's existence has been negated as well. First round for acceptance. ...
First of all, I assert that even the most basic axiom could be false, since there could be some massive hole in it that our potentially defective brains cannot realize. Attempts to render logic relevant (such as Occam's Razor) fail because they are presupposed on the validity of axioms. Whoever accepts this debate must refute this position (first round will be refutation, not acceptance).Puppies!...
No strict rules, lets just have a good debate...Any takers?...
|Statistics based on completed debates.|
Updated 2 Years Ago
This list identifies where InquireTruth stands on popular issues. The choices are limited to the following:
- N/O - No Opinion
- N/S - Not Saying
- Und - Undecided
- Con - Against
- Pro - In Favor
You can also click each issue to find other members that agree with InquireTruth's position on the issue.
|||Global Warming Exists||Con|
|||Medicaid & Medicare||Con|
|||National Health Care||Con|
|||National Retail Sales Tax||N/S|
|||War in Afghanistan||Con|
|||War on Terror||Con|