| Online: | 11 Months Ago | Name: | - Private - | |
| Updated: | 11 Months Ago | Gender: | Male | |
| Joined: | 11 Months Ago | Birthday: | - Private - | |
| President: | Not Saying | Email: | - Private - | |
| Ideology: | Not Saying | Education: | Not Saying | |
| Party: | Not Saying | Ethnicity: | Not Saying | |
| Relationship: | Not Saying | Income: | Not Saying | |
| Interested: | No Answer | Occupation: | Not Saying | |
| Looking: | No Answer | Religion: | Not Saying |
Atheists who read this must pray to stop being atheists
The topic is not the FULL resolution; I'm not arguing that ALL atheists who read this are required to pray to stop being atheists. Keep reading. Consider walking into a dark room. The natural impulse, and indeed the rational thing to do, would be to shout, "Is anyone there?" Are there any reasons why someone would NOT do this? There are a few. First, the possibility of someone else being in the room might simply not occur to him, for whatever reason. Second, the person might think that he...
The argument from design
Philosopher Robin Collins has identified three features of the universe that point strongly to the existence of God: (i) The so-called fine-tuning of laws, constants, and initial conditions of the universe for complex life of comparable intelligence to ourselves. (ii) The extraordinary beauty and elegance of the laws and mathematical structure of the universe. (iii) The intelligibility and discoverability of the basic structure of nature. There is no reason why we would expect any...
The ontological argument
This is Christopher McHugh's version of the Ontological arugment, and it goes like this: 1) God's existence is either logically impossible or logically necessary. 2) God's existence is not logically impossible. 3) Therefore, God necessarily exists. Premise 1 is true because the definition of God does not allow for contingency; it either necessarily exists or it necessarily doesn't exist. Premise 2 is true because it is possible to define God using only negative properties; such proper...
Add as a Friend
Add to My Favorites
Block this Person
Challenge to a Debate
Report this Profile
Send a Message
Share with My Friends
| Debate Statistics | |
| Debates: | 3 |
| Lost: | 3 |
| Tied: | 0 |
| Won: | 0 |
| Win Ratio: | 0.00% |
| Percentile: | 63.57% |
| Elo Ranking: | 1,697 |
| Statistics based on completed debates. | |
| Activity Statistics | |
| Forum Posts: | 0 |
| Votes Cast: | 4 |
| Opinion Arguments: | 0 |
| Opinion Questions: | 0 |
| • | Abortion | N/S |
| • | Affirmative Action | N/S |
| • | Animal Rights | N/S |
| • | Barack Obama | N/S |
| • | Border Fence | N/S |
| • | Capitalism | N/S |
| • | Civil Unions | N/S |
| • | Death Penalty | N/S |
| • | Drug Legalization | N/S |
| • | Electoral College | N/S |
| • | Environmental Protection | N/S |
| • | Estate Tax | N/S |
| • | European Union | N/S |
| • | Euthanasia | N/S |
| • | Federal Reserve | N/S |
| • | Flat Tax | N/S |
| • | Free Trade | N/S |
| • | Gay Marriage | N/S |
| • | Global Warming Exists | N/S |
| • | Globalization | N/S |
| • | Gold Standard | N/S |
| • | Gun Rights | N/S |
| • | Homeschooling | N/S |
| • | Internet Censorship | N/S |
| • | Iran-Iraq War | N/S |
| • | Labor Union | N/S |
| • | Legalized Prostitution | N/S |
| • | Medicaid & Medicare | N/S |
| • | Medical Marijuana | N/S |
| • | Military Intervention | N/S |
| • | Minimum Wage | N/S |
| • | National Health Care | N/S |
| • | National Retail Sales Tax | N/S |
| • | Occupy Movement | N/S |
| • | Progressive Tax | N/S |
| • | Racial Profiling | N/S |
| • | Redistribution | N/S |
| • | Smoking Ban | N/S |
| • | Social Programs | N/S |
| • | Social Security | N/S |
| • | Socialism | N/S |
| • | Stimulus Spending | N/S |
| • | Term Limits | N/S |
| • | Torture | N/S |
| • | United Nations | N/S |
| • | War in Afghanistan | N/S |
| • | War on Terror | N/S |
| • | Welfare | N/S |