 |
Justinisthecrazy's Debates
  |
starcraft/ terran are better
Terran are great for experienced players. They have skills that can help in rushes and in major combat periods....
KirstinKate is a kiddo
KirstinKate is a kiddo for many reasons. Those of which we will discuss in the debate. I will be giving her the edge by allowing her to open and close the arguments....
resolved orange is better than yellow.
yeah. it is....
Deontology is a better ethics system than Utilitarianism
Rally it should be a Philopshical debate. Anyways I will take to the pro side saying that Deontology is better. The con side will say that util is better We will post cases in round 2 Refute/extend cases rest of rounds Um, that's basically it. I hope for a challenging and interesting, intellectual debate....
Taking the life of another human being can in some instances be the lesser of two evils.
It is my argument that, in some exceptional cases, murder can be seen to be the lesser of two evils. Ofcourse, by this I am not claiming that I believe murder to be moral. There are instances however when murder could be seen to be the better of two options. I view this not only from a personal, moral viewpoint but also from a Christian view. I look forward to an intelligent and challenging debate with whoever accepts!...
Who would win in a nuclear war? Russia or the United States of america
I believe that the russians would most indefinetly win in a nuclear war in the united states because of the amount of nuclear weapons they have stockpiled over the years. Also seeing that russian technology rivals the US in many ways, a person can determine that the basic russian soldeirs equipment and traning are far more superior to that of americans. Unfortunately fo the US armed forces Russians soldiers recieve harsher more effective traning. with both of these things combined russia may win...
Resolved: On balance, social networking websites have a positive impact on the United States.
[Before my case is presented, I would like to set the grounds for debate. First round is a reading of cases. The next round is rebuttal and reconstruction, and round 3 is a summary of the case, along with major voting issues, should any be decided by either party. Nearly 110 million unique users log on to social networking sites on a monthly basis, and while there can be many benefits to using these sites, more harm comes from them than good. The resolution states: That, on balance, social ne...
Social networking sites On Balance have had a positive impact on the United States
I will be the con. I wish my opponent the best of Luck. My opponent must start his case in this round or the next post directly under mine. This will be much like a public forum debate. Meaning, definitions may be argued, sources may be argued, and contentions may be argued. Thank you to who ever accepts this and have fun :) The Followign will happen Aff will post a case, neg will post a case/refute the case Aff will refute/extend Neg will refute/extend Aff will have the final w...
vigilantism is justified when government fails to act
Allright, so I know this has been debated multiple times. But anywho I need to try out my neg case. So, it is ld format. aff goes , neg refute case and add case, aff goes refute/continue case, neg refute and continue case, aff refute...
Bnp are cowards
BNP are a cowardly political party, they have no morals or there own views, they are cowards. DONT get me wrong im all for different views beliefs and what not but they are just typical white hypocrites that live a life of taking intellectually to bull there way out of getting to the real reasons. ill let my oponent express there opinion...