 |
Kinesis' Debates
  |
Famer's Story-writing debate tournament Round#1 Famer VS Kinesis
The rules and voting guidelines will be provided here:
S&G will be awarded as usual
Conduct will only be awarded to the side that forfeits least (cursing within the story is allowed as this is a story)
Arguments will be awarded for the side providing the more interesting continuation of the story.
Sources will be awarded to the side with better writing techniques and disp...
Sources have no place in a Philosophical Debate other than to define terms and give counterexamples.
Clarification of Resolution: "or" is meant in the mathematical sense, meaning that sources are reasonable to use in philosophical debate when either they are used to define terms or used to provide counterexamples, or both.
Any honest debater is justified in being concerned about plagiarism. &nbs...
Two can be one
Can you actually prove to me that two can't be one? Waiting for you to accept the challenge. I believe that two can become one with so many proves...........
Compatabilism is a flawed philosophical doctrine.
I originally sent this challenge to Reasoning; however, like most people on this site, he declined my direct challenge. I don't see why considering not only is he a vehement Compatibilist, but so are some of the most brilliant philosophers in the world today. There is plenty of pro-Compatibilist information for my future opponent to steal from the internet, I can assure you. In fact it is the most popular position, so I will...
Ignorance is Bliss
I do put effort into these debates, after all, and it would be most disappointing if after my work nobody thought this debate worth their time.
Abortion is Murder
I will take the affirmative (Pro) position.
Round 1: Acceptance and definitions (and agreement on definitions) Only.
Resolved: Capital punishment in Texas is unjust
I stand in firm negation of todays resolution Resolved: Capital Punishment in Texas is unjust. To start I would like to define a few keys terms, First from Merriam Webster dictionary Unjust is defined as not based on or behaving according to what is morally right and fair. The value to be upheld in today's round is Justice. Justice is defined as (From Merriam Webster) the quality of being just, impartial, or fair. Justice is important in today's round because without Justice in our everyd...
What goes first: The Milk or the Cereal?
Alright, to start off the debate I will first explain the reason behind it. Me and one of my best friends been debating whether A: The milk goes first into the bowl, then the cereal follows, B: The cereal goes into the bowl first, hence the Milk is put in the bowl second. I will be supporting point "B", that the cereal comes first. My opponent will have to support point "A" that the milk goes first into the bowl. This is my first debate so don't blame me if the setup is a bit weird lol....
Final Fantasy VII debate: Aerith's........
so if you have not played the game and plan to someday, leave this page now.
go.....I'm waiting..............................................
Metaethical Moral Relativism
Even if it were established that there are deep and widespread moral disagreements that cannot be rationally resolved, and that these disagreements are more significant than whatever agreements there may be, it would not immediately follow that MMR is correct. Other nonobjectivist conclusions might be drawn. In particular, opponents of objectivism might argue for moral skepticism, that we cannot know moral truths, or for a view that moral judgments lack truth-value (understood to imply a rejecti...