|Online:||1 Week Ago||Name:||- Private -|
|Updated:||10 Months Ago||Gender:||Prefer not to say|
|Joined:||10 Months Ago||Birthday:||- Private -|
|President:||Undecided||Email:||- Private -|
|Relationship:||It's Complicated||Income:||Not Saying|
The rules are simple. My opponent accepts the challenge in round one, and presents ONE of his strongest arguments in favour of the flat earth. Round two is where I present my opening argument, and in which my opponent attempts to rebut it. In round three, I will present my rebuttal for my opponent's strongest argument, and my opponent presents him counter-rebuttal for my refutation. Round four is where I present my counter-rebuttal for my opponent's refutation, and since round one is more or les...
Because the title of your previous challenge is not specific enough, I had thought it best to challenge the instigator (Donkey) to a formal debate with a more fitting title. In this debate, I will (yet again) present my mathematical proof that a limitless god is impossible; and will give the instigator a chance to see that it is indeed a proper mathematical proof. Beyond this, there aren't any more rules to this debate; and so I wish my opponent good luck, for he will need it. Here it i...
1) For something to actually exist, it has to be objective.2) By definition, objectivity requires the objective concept to be well-defined (which cannot be paradoxical or internally contradictory).3) Well-ordered definitions require well-ordered formal languages, and in order for the definition to be non-paradoxical, and hence well-ordered, the defined concept must be completely limited by the defining language (to prevent Russell's paradox), i.e. cannot be the "highest" being.4) God is defined...
My opponent would like scientific proof of a divine creator. I feel that if there were scientific proof of a flat earth, this would in turn prove the former. My opponent will argue that the earth is spherical with empirical evidence, and I will argue that the earth is flat. Burden of proof is shared. Any media currently available can be used as evidence until that media or it's producer is proven falsified or untrustworthy. Opponent may start in R1 with his argument and forfeit the last round, o...
|Statistics based on completed debates.|
This list identifies where KthulhuHimself stands on popular issues. The choices are limited to the following:
- N/O - No Opinion
- N/S - Not Saying
- Und - Undecided
- Con - Against
- Pro - In Favor
You can also click each issue to find other members that agree with KthulhuHimself's position on the issue.
|•||Global Warming Exists||Pro|
|•||Medicaid & Medicare||Und|
|•||National Health Care||N/O|
|•||National Retail Sales Tax||Und|
|•||War in Afghanistan||Con|
|•||War on Terror||Pro|