| Online: | 4 Years Ago | Name: | - Private - | |
| Updated: | 4 Years Ago | Gender: | Male | |
| Joined: | 4 Years Ago | Birthday: | - Private - | |
| President: | Not Saying | Email: | - Private - | |
| Ideology: | Liberal | Education: | Some College | |
| Party: | Democratic Party | Ethnicity: | White | |
| Relationship: | Not Saying | Income: | Less than $25,000 | |
| Interested: | in Women | Occupation: | Student | |
| Looking: | No Answer | Religion: | Agnostic |
| About Me: | I am a mystic, a transcendentalist, and a natural philosopher to boot. I believe in simplification and the search for the truth. I am a psychology major, focusing in addictive behaviors, mental disabilities, and abnormal psychology. I hope to get a BA in psychology, with a minor in Chemistry. I then hope to go to medical school and become a psychiatrist, in the hopes to help cure people of addiction, mental disorders, and personal issues. |
| Activities: | Aerobics, Auto Racing, Bowling, Cycling, Dancing, Hiking, Martial Arts, Racquet Sports, Running, Skiing, Soccer, Swimming, Walking, Weight Lifting, Yoga |
| Beliefs: | I believe what I percieve. |
| Quotes: | "All mankind…being all equal and independent no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty" -John Locke |
Jesus Christ being Alive is verifiable
Assertion: Jesus Christ being Alive is verifiable. This debate should be an interesting one depending on the con. Great Christmas time debate! Victory Conditions: I need to prove that there is a process by which every person can verify that Jesus Christ is alive. The con will need to show that there is no process to verify this. (Assumption: Jesus Christ is a real person and did die.) Needed Definition: Salvation (saved) - redemption: (theology) the act of delivering from sin or savin...
A debate on a topic that I am not mentioning in the topic line.
Alright, to kill the suspense, the topic is "Global Warming is caused by mankind's actions." I negate of course. Since PRO has the burden, I'll let him go first....
The Bible should not be considered a reliable source to quote.
Throughout time people have quoted the bible. Every person and religion has their own interpretation of the Bible. Even athiests believe in the Bible, they simply believe not to believe. The Bible has been quoted to me too many times as proof of the existence of God, and in my opinion as a justification of religion, war, suffering, and ignorance. The Bible should not be considered a reliable source to quote. In order to win this debate, MY OPPONENT MUST PROVE without a doubt that the B...
In a democracy, civil disobedience is an appropriate weapon in the fight for justice.
This is a classic debate topic, whose roots, at least within an American context, go back to the struggle for American independence when British colonists engaged in acts of civil disobedience to protest against British rule. The Boston Tea Party, an act of civil disobedience, helped spark the American Revolution. It was a far less dramatic act of civil disobedience, a single individual refusing to pay his taxes in protest of the Mexican-American war and slavery in the nineteenth century that...
The Bible was not meant to be literally interpreted.
This debate isn't whether we should interpret parts of the Bible literally, there is no "grey area here". It's either to be 100% literally interpreted, or otherwise. ---- ==Pre-modern era Throughout most of the Christian era, Bible reading and Bible interpretation were confined to religious professionals. Until the fifteenth century, the Bible was available only in Latin. Even when the Bible was translated into other languages, the scarcity and high cost of Bibles kept them out of the h...
Add as a Friend
Add to My Favorites
Block this Person
Challenge to a Debate
Report this Profile
Send a Message
Share with My Friends
| Debate Statistics | |
| Debates: | 9 |
| Lost: | 4 |
| Tied: | 0 |
| Won: | 5 |
| Win Ratio: | 55.56% |
| Percentile: | 94.53% |
| Elo Ranking: | 2,181 |
| Statistics based on completed debates. | |
| Activity Statistics | |
| Forum Posts: | 0 |
| Votes Cast: | 19 |
| Opinion Arguments: | 0 |
| Opinion Questions: | 0 |
| • | Abortion | Pro |
| • | Affirmative Action | Con |
| • | Animal Rights | N/S |
| • | Barack Obama | N/S |
| • | Border Fence | Pro |
| • | Capitalism | N/S |
| • | Civil Unions | Pro |
| • | Death Penalty | Pro |
| • | Drug Legalization | Pro |
| • | Electoral College | N/S |
| • | Environmental Protection | Pro |
| • | Estate Tax | Con |
| • | European Union | N/S |
| • | Euthanasia | N/S |
| • | Federal Reserve | N/S |
| • | Flat Tax | Con |
| • | Free Trade | N/S |
| • | Gay Marriage | Pro |
| • | Global Warming Exists | Pro |
| • | Globalization | N/S |
| • | Gold Standard | N/S |
| • | Gun Rights | Pro |
| • | Homeschooling | N/S |
| • | Internet Censorship | N/S |
| • | Iran-Iraq War | Con |
| • | Labor Union | Pro |
| • | Legalized Prostitution | N/S |
| • | Medicaid & Medicare | Pro |
| • | Medical Marijuana | Pro |
| • | Military Intervention | N/S |
| • | Minimum Wage | Pro |
| • | National Health Care | Pro |
| • | National Retail Sales Tax | Pro |
| • | Occupy Movement | N/S |
| • | Progressive Tax | Pro |
| • | Racial Profiling | Con |
| • | Redistribution | N/S |
| • | Smoking Ban | Pro |
| • | Social Programs | Pro |
| • | Social Security | Pro |
| • | Socialism | N/S |
| • | Stimulus Spending | N/S |
| • | Term Limits | Pro |
| • | Torture | N/S |
| • | United Nations | Pro |
| • | War in Afghanistan | Con |
| • | War on Terror | Con |
| • | Welfare | Pro |