Login
Create Account

Do you have a Facebook account?

Online:10 Hours Ago Name:- Private -
Updated:1 Week Ago Gender:Male
Joined:4 Years Ago Birthday:- Private -
President:Not Saying Email:- Private -
Ideology:Liberal Education:Not Saying
Party:Democratic Party Ethnicity:Not Saying
Relationship:Not Saying Income:Not Saying
Interested:No Answer Occupation:Not Saying
Looking:No Answer Religion:Agnostic
About Me:I am myself. I've learned this the hard way. ;)
Activities:Evaluating the logical consistency of arguments, helping people, drawing, writing, singing, exercising (when I can), surfing the net, making inane lists of common activities, this website.
Beliefs:Here come the labels: Agnostic. Transhumanist. Anti-eugenicist. Secular moral apologist. Social libertarian. Pragmatist. Empiricist. Futurist. Duck. Duck. Goose.
Books:The Once and Future King, The Great Gatsby, the Tommyknockers, the Foundation Series (Isaac Asimov)
Movies:Dark City, Forrest Gump, Unbreakable
Music:I like too many people to name.
Quotes:"Examine everything; hold fast the good" -- 1 Thessalonians 5:21
Sports Teams:The one that scores the most points.
TV Shows:Presently: Elementary, PA's Strip Search (which is arguably not a TV show) and Game of Thrones. Previously House and Law and Order. I used to like CNN, but I am on a news hiatus right now.
Websites:

Omniscience and omnipotence

PacFrank
Lexicaholic

I checked religion as the "category" here, but I think it ain't religion It's just plain old logic. And I think you are asking the wrong question if you wish to get any sensible answer. First of all, it would be logically impossible for any being to be both omniscient and omnipotent, if for no other reason, than to point out that an omniscient being could never change its mind and remain omniscient. What kind of omnipotence is it where one couldn't even change one's mind? And from a practical...

Post Voting Period
5 Comments
Updated 1 Week Ago

Animal rights is an unjustified ethical doctrine.

TheSkeptic
Lexicaholic

I thank my opponent for accepting this debate - I've been wanting to have this debate with my opponent specifically for awhile, so I hope this turns out well. To put it simply, it seems that Charlie here is one of the more prominent PETA advocates on this website, with his slew of PETA debates. Since it seems to be quite evident that he is in favor of PETA, one can easily draw the conclusion that he is also an animal right's activist - after all, if he isn't then he'd most likely be a hypocri...

Voting Period
62 Comments
Updated 3 Years Ago

Democrats are violators of the law

Lepricon
Lexicaholic

*** INTELLIGENT PEOPLE ONLY I will let CON start since I am in a hurry. My claim, Democrats and Liberals are in violation of American law under the basis that their beliefs and actions fall under that of treason, and just punishment is to incarcerate or kill all of the aforementioned party. I await a challenger....

Voting Period
6 Comments
Updated 3 Years Ago

My Application Form is good enough to make me pass the test to join IDS.

acetraveler
Lexicaholic

Kyunghee University : http://www.kyunghee.edu/(http://www.khu.ac.kr/main/index.html) IDS : http://club.cyworld.com/club/main/club_main.asp?club_id=50948613 Kyunghee University have a English debate club named IDS. This club is a 69th ranker in the world. The club members can participate national and international English debate Championships. I eagerly want to join this club to participate World University Debate Championship. So I had a interview to join this club in May. But I couldn't jo...

Voting Period
18 Comments
Updated 3 Years Ago

It is irrational for God to hold humanity to a code God does not follow

Lexicaholic
JustCallMeTarzan

1. Introduction JCMT has noted that he is looking for an interesting religious debate and I would like to deliver. JCMT, in this thread - http://www.debate.org/forums/religion/topic/2215/ , stated that : "An omniscient God creates several problems for morality in general, most specifically the problem of holding people responsible if God knows what their actions will be. Furthermore, God represents a somewhat unusual case of an entity that can somehow be the arbiter of morality, but not...

Post Voting Period
18 Comments
Updated 3 Years Ago
Lexicaholic
Debates:31
Lost:7
Tied:0
Won:24
Win Ratio:77.42%
Percentile:98.78%
Elo Ranking:3,003
Forum Posts:525
Votes Cast:208
Opinion Arguments:0
Opinion Questions:0
2 Albums
Political Tests
Updated 3 Years Ago
Coulter Debate
Updated 3 Years Ago
Disagree: 0.00%
Agree: 0.00%
AbortionN/O
Affirmative Action
Animal RightsN/S
Barack ObamaN/S
Border Fence
CapitalismN/S
Civil Unions
Death Penalty
Drug Legalization
Electoral CollegeN/S
Environmental Protection
Estate Tax
European UnionN/S
Euthanasia
Federal ReserveN/S
Flat Tax
Free TradeN/S
Gay Marriage
Global Warming Exists
GlobalizationN/S
Gold StandardN/S
Gun Rights
HomeschoolingN/S
Internet CensorshipN/S
Iran-Iraq War
Labor Union
Legalized ProstitutionN/S
Medicaid & MedicareUnd
Medical Marijuana
Military InterventionN/S
Minimum Wage
National Health Care
National Retail Sales Tax
Occupy MovementN/S
Progressive Tax
Racial Profiling
RedistributionN/S
Smoking Ban
Social Programs
Social Security
SocialismN/S
Stimulus SpendingN/S
Term Limits
TortureN/S
United Nations
War in Afghanistan
War on Terror
WelfareUnd