this is like thett's debate except you made me mad and this is like a suggestion to innomen. You have lowered the quality of this site....
First round for rules/definitions.
1. There are no restrictions on argumentative strategy.
2. Burden of proof is shared.
3. This debate concerns the resolution:
RESOLVED: K'nex are better than Legos.
4. New arguments brought in the last round will not be counted.
why not? sex is good. you know you want it...
If I can prove that evolution is speculative I can then make the point that creationism, which is also speculative, should be given equal attention as evolution.
First round acceptance only.
The Burden of Proof is on me.
noobs challenge me i can take on anyone...
its not even a word haha loser
his name doesnt even make sense my name makes sense
vote for me
This debate does not have the acceptance rule: C1: Deters crime Ernest Van Den Haag, PhD, late Professor of Jurisprudence at Fordham University, in an Oct. 17, 1983 New York Times Op-Ed article titled "For the Death Penalty," wrote the following: "Common sense, lately bolstered by statistics, tells us that the death penalty will deter murder, if anything can. People fear nothing more than death. Therefore, nothing will deter a criminal more than the fear of death. Death is final. But wher...
If you agree and want to be able to vote on debates, simply type an agreement below. Instant Debate Over!
With mad disquietude on the dull sky,
The pall of a past wor...