|Online:||1 Week Ago||Name:||- Private -|
|Updated:||2 Months Ago||Gender:||Male|
|Joined:||4 Years Ago||Birthday:||June 14, 1988|
|President:||Not Saying||Email:||- Private -|
|Interested:||in Women||Occupation:||Not Saying|
|About Me:||I am going on sabbatical from this website due to my commitment towards learning a new language; I need to immerse myself as much as possible. Not that I don't enjoy this website; I just simply wont have the time and energy to post in the forums/debate. I may drop by occasionally to post in the forums or I may debate depending on if the subject matter interests me enough but don't hold your breath. If you really want to discuss something or entice me to debate here it'd be best to hit me up on facebook. https://www.facebook.com/chris.lloyd.184|
|Quotes:||"Let each man hope and believe what he can."|
-- Charles Darwin
I thank Sargon agreeing to debate me on this topic. I shall be arguing that given moral realism theism is more likely than atheism. Or that theism makes "more sense" of moral realism than atheism does. My job is to argue that, yes, theism offer a more likely context in which to affirm moral realism and Con's job is to argue that, to the contrary, atheism offers a more likely context than theism in which to affirm moral realism. In short, this will be a mostly meta-ethical debate. DefintionsTh...
I thank Rational_Thinker for agreeing to debate this topic with me.I will be arguing that moral subjectivism is false or that there are good reasons for supposing that moral subjectivism ought to be rejected as a meta-ethical theory.DefinitionsI take moral subjectivism to mean:The meta-ethical view which claims that: Ethical sentences express propositions. Some such propositions are true. Those propositions are about the attitudes of people. RulesRound 1 is for acceptance and clarification an...
I thank AeneasPhebe for agreeing to debate this contentious topic with me.DefinitionsGod: is the creator and sustainer of the universe and is unlimited with regard to knowledge (omniscience), power (omnipotence), extension (omnipresence), and moral perfection. Genocide: ..any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:(a) Killing members of the group;(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members...
Hello popculturepooka & fellow debaters, This debate has arisen from a forum thread for which the link is below. http://www.debate.org/forums/religion/topic/33629/ I would maintain that Hell, in the Christian tradition is a Morally abhorrent concept, and will be arguing this assertion. Round 1: Acceptance Round 2: Opening arguments Round 3: Rebuttal Round 4: Closing statements - no new arguments I am honoured to enter this debate and as a new forum member look forward to an...
This topic can become mired in cross-purposes of vocabulary, so I will allot the first round for acceptance, definitions, clarifications, etc.Definition: An omniscient entity is one which lacks no knowledge of any information, whether necessary or contingent, for at least one point of its existence.I posit this so as to not definitionally exclude different versions of omniscience from the argument. Specifically, this definition is designed to not immediately rule out: anterograde omniscience; &l...
|Statistics based on completed debates.|
Updated 3 Years Ago
This list identifies where popculturepooka stands on popular issues. The choices are limited to the following:
- N/O - No Opinion
- N/S - Not Saying
- Und - Undecided
- Con - Against
- Pro - In Favor
You can also click each issue to find other members that agree with popculturepooka's position on the issue.
|•||Global Warming Exists||Pro|
|•||Medicaid & Medicare||Pro|
|•||National Health Care||Und|
|•||National Retail Sales Tax||Und|
|•||War in Afghanistan||Con|
|•||War on Terror||Und|