|Online:||3 Weeks Ago||Name:||- Private -|
|Updated:||3 Years Ago||Gender:||Male|
|Joined:||9 Years Ago||Birthday:||August 3, 1989|
|President:||Not Saying||Email:||- Private -|
|Looking:||Friendship, Dating, A Relationship||Religion:||Atheist|
|About Me:||I don't know why you'd want to concern yourself with this. If you do, ask me a question. Oh, and maybe so I repeat myself a little less, I CANNOT VOTE ON THIS WEBSITE NOOBS. My "looking" status is as it is primarily due to the requirement to be honest about keeping my eyes open. It does not go to the extent of bending my neck often :D|
|Activities:||Judo, reading, DDO, vidya games.|
|Beliefs:||I am an Objectivist, though more aligned with the David Kelley/TAS faction than the Leonard Peikoff/ARI faction. For those unfamiliar with this, it means, in short, that in matters of ultimate reality, what you see is what you get; that reasoning from experience and the abstractions made from experience is the root of all knowledge; that I live my life as an end in myself, and that the only societal arrangement compatible with these statements is the free market- the prohibition of non-retaliatory force and fraud against persons and their property from human relations.|
|Books:||Atlas Shrugged, the Wheel of Time series, the Sword of Truth series. This should not be construed as defining series as books, only as noting that the component books of these series are among my favorite books.|
|Music:||Metallica, Megadeth, Black Sabbath, Rush, Nine Inch Nails, Pantera, Iron Maiden, Anthrax, Trans-Siberian Orchestra, Savatage, Sergei Rachmaninov, Type O Negative|
|Quotes:||" The verdict you pronounce upon the source of your livelihood (money) is the verdict you pronounce upon your life. If the source is corrupt, you have damned your own existence."--Atlas Shrugged|
|Sports Teams:||Minnesota Vikings.|
|TV Shows:||FullMetal Panic, Excel Saga, Death Note, Code Geass, Family Guy|
Resolution: If you are not free to choose between a pencil or a pen, than you are not free to write what you wantRules:1.) No Ad Hominem Attacks2.) Dismissed arguements will be considered droppedDebate Format:1st round: acceptance only2nd round: Arguements / no rebuttals3rd round: Rebuttals / no arguements4th round: Defense against rebuttals & closing remarks / no new arguements or rebuttals...
I know that this bill has a lot of support in Washington, but what about outside the capitol? Does anybody feel strongly against this bill?...
My opponent offered this among infinitely other debates. I await his abiding by his word. ...
Let's see if Ragnar is up on his game. 1,000 char maximum, 1st round for intros....
I thank Ragnar_Rahl for agreeing to debate this topic with me.Resolution: Firing decisions based on union status should be outlawed.Union: http://en.wikipedia.org...Character Limit: 6000RoundsRound 1: Acceptance onlyRound 2: Opening arguments/RebuttalsRound 3: Rebuttals/ResponsesRound 4: Closing, no new argumentsPro will argue that employers should not fire employees based purely on Union Status. Firing based on breaking policies or laws as part of the union is okay. Con will argu...
|Statistics based on completed debates.|
This list identifies where Ragnar_Rahl stands on popular issues. The choices are limited to the following:
- N/O - No Opinion
- N/S - Not Saying
- Und - Undecided
- Con - Against
- Pro - In Favor
You can also click each issue to find other members that agree with Ragnar_Rahl's position on the issue.