|Online:||3 Years Ago||Name:||- Private -|
|Updated:||3 Years Ago||Gender:||Male|
|Joined:||3 Years Ago||Birthday:||- Private -|
|President:||Not Saying||Email:||- Private -|
|Party:||Peace and Freedom Party||Ethnicity:||White|
|Relationship:||Not Saying||Income:||Not Saying|
|Interested:||in Women||Occupation:||Not Saying|
|Beliefs:||Mostly agnostic, sometimes extremely antireligious. Politically, I'm a libertarian and I think people should do whatever the hell they want (as long as it doesn't affect someone else's freedoms).|
|Books:||Don't really have one. I read anything nonfiction.|
|Music:||Pretty much anything. I mostly listen to whatever's on the radio.|
|TV Shows:||Wilfred, Arrested Development, Big Bang Theory, How I Met Your Mother, American Dad, South Park, Futurama, Family Guy (sometimes), Code Geass, Fullmetal Alchemist: Brotherhood|
I'm going to try this one more time...hopefully I won't have any trolls or forfeiters. By Pro, I am arguing that God probably doesn't exist. For the purposes of this debate, God shall refer to the Judeo-Christian deity. God - (in Christianity and other monotheistic religions) The omnipotent creator and ruler of the universe and source of all moral authority Exist - To have actual beingRules: The burden of proof shall be shared.No arguments in the first round. C...
Rules:1. If Con starts the argument in the first round, he/she must not use the last round. If Con simply uses the first round for acceptance, they can use their last round.2. BoP is shared.3. Invoking Godwin's Law will result in immediate loss of conduct and argument points.4. If someone uses semantic arguments, the opponent also has the right to use semantics without loss of conduct points.5. If you have any questions about the rules, message me or put it in the comment section. Exploiting loo...
after talking to friends of all ages from countries worldwide. i keep hearing a common idea. that america needs a revise. not a new political party. but the whole thing. were a booming nation that's working off of a .... old piece of paper... i dont know but i honestly know parts of the government is corrupt. its inevitable. with power comes corruption, its a human motif. but what alot of people are saying more and more is that after WW2 the U.S has been a bloodshed undercover. and im no crackpo...
This is a redux of the previous debate, "The biblical God probably doesn't exist." In my opinion a more appropriate thesis for that particular debate would have been "Physical evidence doesn't support an omniscient, omnibenevolent, omnipoent interpretation of the God of the Bible." In short, I'm challenging Sketchy to the same debate against me. *This is my first debate on Debate.org, so please forgive if I'm not familiar with how everything works. Since Sketchy is the one that initiated...
By Pro, I am arguing that God probably doesn't exist. For the purposes of this debate, God shall refer to the Judeo-Christian deity. God - (in Christianity and other monotheistic religions) The omnipotent creator and ruler of the universe and source of all moral authority Exist - To have actual beingRules: The burden of proof shall be shared. No arguments in the first round. Con must state in Round 1 if God is also omniscient and/or omnibenevolent. If Con does...
|Statistics based on completed debates.|
This list identifies where Sketchy stands on popular issues. The choices are limited to the following:
- N/O - No Opinion
- N/S - Not Saying
- Und - Undecided
- Con - Against
- Pro - In Favor
You can also click each issue to find other members that agree with Sketchy's position on the issue.
|•||Global Warming Exists|
|•||Medicaid & Medicare||Con|
|•||National Health Care|
|•||National Retail Sales Tax||Pro|
|•||War in Afghanistan||Und|
|•||War on Terror||Und|