|Online:||3 Months Ago||Name:||Samuel Chen|
|Updated:||3 Months Ago||Gender:||Male|
|Joined:||4 Years Ago||Birthday:||April 19, 1993|
|President:||Not Saying||Email:||- Private -|
|Relationship:||Single||Income:||Less than $25,000|
Pretty simple, I hope I can continue getting away with this lazy format. Round 1 consists of my introduction and my opponent listing at least 3 philosophical issues to debate. If desired, they can choose which side of the debate I am on (me being PRO is merely wording, as double negatives obviously exist). The more topics the better. Fingers crossed for an enjoyable debate....
Evolution is taught in school and creation is frowned upon but there are just as many flaws in evolution as there are in creation....
This debate is for Freeman's tournament.This first round serves as an introduction, definitions, and parameters. My opponent can decide to start his arguments in his first round, or wait for subsequent rounds. Abortion will refer to the intentional termination of a human pregnancy. Furthermore, I will focus on first trimester abortions exclusively as the vast majority of abortions are of such. The issue of later abortions get more complicated due to the development of certain biological features...
For Merda's Tournament The first round is for acceptance simply to get this debate going If my opponent wishes he can make definitions and present a case. Rules: 1 no semantics 2 if you want you can present a philosophy or simply use philosophical logic (whatever that means). 3 each one of us has to present a case and rebut/refute the others. 4 have fun (or not)...
Sorry for the long delay, I had a lot of personal issues. Anyway, this is the first round for Freeman's tournament and an anticipated debate between me and my opponent. It's also been awhile since Ive debated - hopefully it's an enjoyable experience. I've made it 4 rounds since my plan was that Round 1 would be moreso of an introduction, or further stipulations/modifications that may be added. Here I want to define Rawlsian theory, make some clarifications, and invite my opponent to the sa...
|Statistics based on completed debates.|
This list identifies where TheSkeptic stands on popular issues. The choices are limited to the following:
- N/O - No Opinion
- N/S - Not Saying
- Und - Undecided
- Con - Against
- Pro - In Favor
You can also click each issue to find other members that agree with TheSkeptic's position on the issue.
|||Global Warming Exists|
|||Medicaid & Medicare|
|||National Health Care||N/S|
|||National Retail Sales Tax||N/S|
|||War in Afghanistan||N/S|
|||War on Terror|