|Online:||2 Years Ago||Name:||- Private -|
|Updated:||4 Years Ago||Gender:||Male|
|Joined:||4 Years Ago||Birthday:||- Private -|
|President:||Not Saying||Email:||- Private -|
|Relationship:||Not Saying||Income:||$25,000 to $35,000|
|Looking:||No Answer||Religion:||Not Saying|
|About Me:||I only debate what I do not believe. For if I debate what I believe and lose than I am either wrong, or a bad debater.|
|Activities:||Baseball, Basketball, Billiards, Bowling, Cycling, Football, Golf, Hiking, Inline Skating, Racquet Sports, Skiing, Soccer, Swimming, Volleyball|
|Quotes:||Is a hippopotamus just a hippopotamus, or a really cool opotamus.|
|Sports Teams:||Chicago Bears, Chicago Cubs, and Chicago Bulls|
|TV Shows:||Family Guy, Scrubs, That 70's show, Futurama, Chuck, and Whose Line is it Anyways.|
To my esteemed NOK_Domination, I would like to wish you luck in this round and hope this will be a good debate round. I would like to thank the judges, and I hope to be a good opponent. With that I shall begin. Affirmative action should be practiced in college admissions. But to better understand why, we must first understand what affirmative action actually is. Affirmative action is a policy or policies of governments and other institutions that are designed to actively promote and advance...
To my esteemed BNesiba, Hello and good luck. I would like to thank my judges, specifically Burningpuppies101 and LakevilleNorthJT. I hope this to be a good debate and wish my opponent the best of luck. With that, I shall begin. Because this is a value debate, I shall begin by stating the value and criteria that I believe this debate should be weighed upon. The value of this debate should be an individual's right to success. And the criteria should be an individual's quality of life. This mea...
I am not arguing for or against it at this point, but am leaving it up to my opponent to decide. This means that I will not be arguing this first round, so my opponent doesn't have to as well. But if he/she would like to speak first, then that would be fine with me....
Res: It is morally permissible to kill one innocent person to save the lives of more innocent people
In affirming the resolution, the affirmative and the judge will rationalize the death of an individual or individuals in the name of the "greater good." With the idea that death protects us and is morally permissible for our survival, government leaders or other leaders, will be able to use this resolution as a smoke screen to justify any of their actions that lead to death. Value: Morality Criterion: Keeping power over our own lives so that we do not have to be at the will of a higher in...
I will provide a list of topics, choose one, you're CON, I'm PRO. Then in R2 I go and post. Note, I am playing Devil's advocate in some places. 1. Most nonhuman Animal's do not deserve rights. 2. Utilitarianism is superior to Kantianism. 3. Sarah Palin is not as incompetent as she is made out to be. 4. Cannibalism of dead people should be socially acceptable, if not encouraged. 5. Agriculture was a mistake. 6. Anarchy could feasibly work. 7. Functionalism is a flawed theory of mind. 8....
|Statistics based on completed debates.|
This list identifies where The_Devils_Advocate stands on popular issues. The choices are limited to the following:
- N/O - No Opinion
- N/S - Not Saying
- Und - Undecided
- Con - Against
- Pro - In Favor
You can also click each issue to find other members that agree with The_Devils_Advocate's position on the issue.
|||Global Warming Exists||N/S|
|||Medicaid & Medicare||N/S|
|||National Health Care||N/S|
|||National Retail Sales Tax||N/S|
|||War in Afghanistan||N/S|
|||War on Terror||N/S|