|Online:||3 Weeks Ago||Name:||- Private -|
|Updated:||1 Year Ago||Gender:||Male|
|Joined:||1 Year Ago||Birthday:||- Private -|
|President:||Not Saying||Email:||- Private -|
|Interested:||in Women||Occupation:||Not Saying|
First I would like to thank bbowhan for accepting this debate topic. I would like to additionally offer to all interested that I would be glad to debate this topic with other people. Finally, I would like to encourage bbowhan to collaborate with others n the assembly of his arguments, as per rule 8 below.The topic of bestiality and zoophilia are questionable and oft sticky topics (pun intended), which generally produce a visceral reaction in the course of their discussion. Historically, sex with...
FIRST ROUND ACCEPTANCE AND RULES ONLY Update: Alright, I will give some insights as to what the argument entails. Its an argument about the actual true purpose of civil marriage which involves procreation and how redefining marriage (or gay marriage) will produce immeasurable consequences onto society. However, its NOT the mainstream procreation argument heard time and time again. Some people may have already seen it in other debates I have been in. In this debate, My opponent will ha...
My ArgumentMitt Romney has a good chance of winning the general election against President Obama and all the third party candidates who have a bad chance of winning.My opponent must argue why he has a bad chance of winning and that Obama has a better chance to.Round 1 is just for acceptance.No semantics!...
The debate topic is that there is no doubt that unicorns ever existed. I will be arguing the negative, that is, my opponent is claiming that they can prove, beyond reasonable doubt, that unicorns never existed, and I will attempt to put reasonable doubt in the voters' minds. Another way to put it is that a unicorn never existing is not doubted. The slightly confusing wording in the topic is to put the burden of proof on my opponent, as it would be impossible (baring a miraculous fossil discovery...
As I have recently had an argument on this subject which was not resolved, I would like to place this debate that Hitler was not a Christian, but Atheist in order to get a feel for the arguments that Pro would likely use. I would like your Round 1 to be Pro's initial argument, and to have alternating argument/ counterarguments. As this subject is necessarily a Godwin's Law scenario, I feel I must reiterate that 1.) no ad hominem attacks 2.) cite ALL your sources (the last argument didn't). I w...
|Statistics based on completed debates.|
This list identifies where bbowhan stands on popular issues. The choices are limited to the following:
- N/O - No Opinion
- N/S - Not Saying
- Und - Undecided
- Con - Against
- Pro - In Favor
You can also click each issue to find other members that agree with bbowhan's position on the issue.
|||Global Warming Exists||N/S|
|||Medicaid & Medicare||N/S|
|||National Health Care||N/S|
|||National Retail Sales Tax||N/S|
|||War in Afghanistan||N/S|
|||War on Terror||N/S|