|Online:||2 Years Ago||Name:||Sam Jackson|
|Updated:||2 Years Ago||Gender:||Male|
|Joined:||5 Years Ago||Birthday:||September 3, 1960|
|President:||Not Saying||Email:||- Private -|
|Ideology:||Not Saying||Education:||Not Saying|
|Party:||Not Saying||Ethnicity:||Not Saying|
|Interested:||No Answer||Occupation:||Not Saying|
|Looking:||No Answer||Religion:||Not Saying|
Greetings to my opponent and all viewers. Have fun and good luck in the proceeding rounds. Right, now to express my argument; it is the belief of many that humans are not inherently good, but instead possess the hereditary propensity to "sin." I will advocate this viewpoint. Firstly, we must establish that "sin" exists in religious (and secular) moral and ethical standards, and thus this can't be debated in the argument. Dictionary.com defines "sin" as follows, "transgression of divine l...
The "Ground Rules" The challenger will be a Christian who believes that God either did or could have used macro-evolution as His method to create life on earth. This debate will NOT be on the existence of God, non-Christian deities, atheism vs theism, the validity of evolution or the validity of Biblical creation. The Argument: I contend that macro-evolution, as currently understood and popularly accepted, is absolutely incompatible with Christian Doctrine and it is therefore impossible...
I will argue here that Catholicism is more morally admirable than Protestantism, as a whole. In the tenets in which the two differ, Catholicism is more admirable. It is more consistent in its stances, preaches better morals, and its principles have more positive ramifications than those of Protestantism. I will go into more detail in the next rounds. My opponent must debate that Protestantism is more morally admirable than Catholicism. Thank you to whomever accepts this challenge....
Greetings to my opponent, beem0r. And thanks to the judges and spectators enjoying this debate. I stand in affirmation of the addressed resolution: Resolved: An ideal form of NCLB would be beneficial to the welfare of the United States. Definitions: Ideal – adjective - conforming to an ultimate standard of perfection or excellence. Beneficial – adjective - promoting or enhancing well-being. Welfare – noun - well-being. NCLB (No Child Left Behind Act) – proper noun – an act relat...
I stand in affirmation of the resolution: an ideal form of No Child Left Behind (hereafter referred to as NCLB) would be beneficial to the welfare of the United States. ==== DEFINITIONS ==== D1: Ideal a] Most suitable; perfect.  b] Desirable or perfect but existing only in the imagination.  D2: Form of NCLB A form of NCLB will be defined as having at least the same goals as NCLB and at least some of the means NCLB attempts to use to reach its goals. Goal of NCLB: Ga] To im...
|Statistics based on completed debates.|
This list identifies where beem0r stands on popular issues. The choices are limited to the following:
- N/O - No Opinion
- N/S - Not Saying
- Und - Undecided
- Con - Against
- Pro - In Favor
You can also click each issue to find other members that agree with beem0r's position on the issue.
|||Global Warming Exists||N/S|
|||Medicaid & Medicare||N/S|
|||National Health Care||N/S|
|||National Retail Sales Tax||N/S|
|||War in Afghanistan||N/S|
|||War on Terror||N/S|