|Online:||6 Days Ago||Name:||- Private -|
|Updated:||3 Months Ago||Gender:||Male|
|Joined:||4 Years Ago||Birthday:||- Private -|
|President:||Not Saying||Email:||- Private -|
|Ideology:||Not Saying||Education:||Not Saying|
|Interested:||in Women||Occupation:||Not Saying|
|About Me:||I am the proud author of The Gospel Truth, Sabbath Versus Sunday Error: 2000 Years of Error, and Not My Baby, all available on amazon.com. You can reach me at firstname.lastname@example.org.|
consider: the son is God, the father is GOd, but the son is not the father and they are not separate Gods. that's like saying five plus one equals six. two plus four equals six. but five plus one does NOT equal two plus four....
The Terms for this debate round be the LD debate round. 1. 1AC 2.C/X 3. 1NC 4.C/X 5. 1AR 6. 1NR 7. 1NC 8. voting period. No using Wikipedia as a credible source. Do you accept these terms? Aff: Fundamental Rights Why should we live in a nation that values protection above our rights? We shouldn"t live in a nation that values protection above our rights as citizens. We need our fundamental rights to secure our individual privacy. I am Resolved that When in Conflict the R...
Hello all! This debate is on the abolishment of the death penalty. This is one of my favorite debate topics, so I hope for a great challenge!Definitionsdeath penalty: the legally authorized killing of someone as punishment for a crime. abolishment: to end the observance or effect of LayoutRound 1: acceptanceRound 2: ALL arguments presentedRound 3: rebuttal (no new arguments)Round 4: rebuttal pt. 2 (no new arguments)Round 5: conclusion/closing statements (no new arguments)...
This is a problem that I have spent a long time considering. I have come to the conclusion that it is not possible to say that there is a God who is all loving, all knowing and all able because of the existence of evil. This is often referred to as the rock of atheism and it has founded my entire attitude toward religion, mainly that attitude is that it is not something I can believe. I look forward to someone who can challenge this statement, and who will debate it openly with me without taking...
ResolutionBeing agnostic in regards to the historicity of St. Paul is justifiable.As Pro I need to show that one can be justified in holding the position of uncertainty on whether or not St. Paul existed in history.Con needs to demonstrate that it one cannot justify the position of uncertainty on whether or not St. Paul existed in history.RulesRound 1 is for acceptance only.Round 2 is for opening case only, no rebuttals.Round 3 is for extending one's case and rebuttals.Round 4 is for rebuttals o...
|Statistics based on completed debates.|
This list identifies where daley stands on popular issues. The choices are limited to the following:
- N/O - No Opinion
- N/S - Not Saying
- Und - Undecided
- Con - Against
- Pro - In Favor
You can also click each issue to find other members that agree with daley's position on the issue.
|•||Global Warming Exists||N/S|
|•||Medicaid & Medicare||N/S|
|•||National Health Care||Pro|
|•||National Retail Sales Tax||Con|
|•||War in Afghanistan||N/S|
|•||War on Terror||N/S|