Debate Rounds (5)
pick up 0 sodas from the floor
i can cut an apple in 4 pieces, and then resemble the apple and have it look like i got a full apple, but i have an apple in 4 pieces
1+0=1 is a false equation, 1 can not be added to 0, so its just 1, 1 banana + 0 bananas dosnt mean 1 banana dissapears and neither is 0 bananas added, it simple cant happen, and i still have 1 banana..
1+0=1 by Pro's own logic. Mathematically, 1 banana + 0 bananas means it still remains as one banana, as nothing was added. Pro's logic defies themselves in this matter. Pro must prove that 1+0 is an impossible equation.
The primary aspect of the resolution which I question is that information is nothing.
OB1. Pro must prove every aspect of the resolution, whereas I need to only refute a single aspect to render the resolution baseless.
I challenge "information=o" or "information=nothing".
there is no your and my logic, logic is determined by existence as it is
0 can not be added to 1. pick up 0 sodas from the floor. imagine a sticker of your choosing, supernatural flamethrowing dragon sticker, and put it on a soda in your hand, or on your table...
As I mentioned in OB1, Pro has to prove that information is nothing, and 1 is matter. 1 may even be a unit to measure energy. Now I will show you how 0 can be something while the net value is nonetheless 0.
According to the zero-energy universe hypothesis, which is widely accepted by physicists because of the homogeneity of the universe, the vector force of gravity acts as negative energy over the scalar positive energy, that cancel out each other in the universe. Therefore, the some of all energy in the universe is zero, but the universe has some energy nonetheless. 
1 can also be a value of non-matter energy.
anything is 1
i dont believe in a universe
positive and negative creates a balancing point.. its not 0, like with a magnet, dosnt mean there is no energy in it... i have never heard anything as silly as that argument really
if i burn you with a lighter, is it nothing?
"Positive and negative creates a balancing point, it's not 0 ..."
This must be demonstrated. 1 +(-1) =0, according to standard mathematics. The zero-energy universe hypothesis perfectly demonstrates that the net value is 0, but there is energy in it. All of Pro's arguments are bare assertions.
I extend all my arguments.
energy is not nothing..
Precisely. Energy is not nothing, even when its net value is 0. Therefore, 0 is not nothing. Furthermore, Pro still has not proven that information is nothing, or refuted any of my arguments. I extend all my arguments.
thats what im saying.. energy is not 0
That is a bare assertion. Via. the homogeneity of the universe, I have demonstrated how the sum of all the energy in the universe is zero, but nonetheless there is energy. The resolution is negated. Vote Con!
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by tejretics 1 year ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||3|
Reasons for voting decision: Con's demonstration of the zero-energy universe was accurate. The sum of all energy in the universe adds up to a net value of zero, but the universe is nonetheless not empty of energy, as clearly illustrated in the image of the zero-energy genesis. The ZEU is completely accurate and proven to be likely by the fact that the universe is isotropic and homogeneous. Con's OB1 allows them to disprove a *single* aspect of the resolution to win, which they did. ALL Pro's arguments were *bare assertions*, and did not aid the resolution. Overall victory to Con.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.