The Instigator
JustCallMeTarzan
Pro (for)
Winning
45 Points
The Contender
solo
Con (against)
Losing
41 Points

1.9999... (repeating) equals 2.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/9/2008 Category: Science
Updated: 9 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 6,263 times Debate No: 1585
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (29)
Votes (22)

 

JustCallMeTarzan

Pro

This is in response to the numerous 1 = 2 posts with the mathematical error.

******************************************

Let A = 1.99999999... repeating.

10 * A = 19.999999... repeating.

Subtract A from each side...

10A - A = 18.0

9A = 18.0

Divide by 9.

A = 2

Substitute.

1.9999999... repeating = 2.
solo

Con

1.9999999... repeating does NOT = 2.

If 1.9999999... repeating = 1.9999999... repeating

AND

2 = 2

THEN

1.9999999... repeating cannot ever = 2

Otherwise A could have equalled 3.

Let A = 3.

10 * A = 30.

Subtract A from each side...

10A - A = 18.0

9A = 18.0

Divide by 9.

A = 3

Substitute.

1.9999999... repeating = 3

AND

2 = 3

A THEORETICAL POSSIBILITY, BUT A MATHEMATICAL IMPOSSIBILITY

Therefore 1.9999... (repeating) is NOT equal to 2.

Thanks for the debate!
Debate Round No. 1
29 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by rougeagent21 8 years ago
rougeagent21
Solo,
While I agree that 1.99999...does not equal 2, your math is flawed.
Let A = 3.

10 * A = 30.

Subtract A from each side...

10A - A = 18.0 <-- NOT TRUE! 9 x 3 = 27, NOT 18

9A = 18.0
Posted by Thoreau 9 years ago
Thoreau
Here, think about this: Graphs of square-root functions. Sure, the graph gets very, very, very close to the asymptote, and for all purposes is essentially the same, but is it really? No. Same thing here.
Posted by kennard 9 years ago
kennard
For anyone who is interested in seeing the proof that I was talking about (showing that 1.999 repeating is NOT equal
to 2), you can go check it out at the following link:

http://www.debate.org...
Posted by Rob1Billion 9 years ago
Rob1Billion
there you go, kennard. Have at it.
Posted by Rob1Billion 9 years ago
Rob1Billion
Do you promise to go easy on me?
Posted by kennard 9 years ago
kennard
Rob1Billion: I am still waiting for you to start a debate with the same proof shown here and challenge me.
Posted by kennard 9 years ago
kennard
Well Rob1Billion, create a debate with the same proof, challenge me, and I'll write mine.
Posted by Rob1Billion 9 years ago
Rob1Billion
this math is very simple, and very straight to the point. Kennard: please stop talking about your proof and show it to us!
Posted by Tatarize 9 years ago
Tatarize
I'm a mathematician and I can tell you, that arguments from authority are complete crap. Though Tarzan is right, he's being cheap and making up a nonsense argument. I personally have won a debate that 2 + 2 = 4, and can tell you that math based debates are silly and trite.
Posted by kennard 9 years ago
kennard
I am a mathematician as well. And the fact is that 1.999... is NOT equal to 2. I have a proof about this, and I can show that the proof made by call "JustCallMe Tarzan" is wrong.
The flaw is in the fourth line, the one that indicates that
10A - A =18.0
22 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by Tatarize 8 years ago
Tatarize
JustCallMeTarzansoloTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by rougeagent21 8 years ago
rougeagent21
JustCallMeTarzansoloTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by mastajake 8 years ago
mastajake
JustCallMeTarzansoloTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by s0m31john 8 years ago
s0m31john
JustCallMeTarzansoloTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by solo 8 years ago
solo
JustCallMeTarzansoloTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Jamcke 8 years ago
Jamcke
JustCallMeTarzansoloTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Vote Placed by flor 9 years ago
flor
JustCallMeTarzansoloTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by bigblue 9 years ago
bigblue
JustCallMeTarzansoloTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Vote Placed by Judiciator 9 years ago
Judiciator
JustCallMeTarzansoloTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Vote Placed by cLoser 9 years ago
cLoser
JustCallMeTarzansoloTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03