The Instigator
SlovakiaKentros
Con (against)
Winning
1 Points
The Contender
nikolaspajan
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points

13 is the age when boys become men

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
SlovakiaKentros
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/13/2015 Category: Technology
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 572 times Debate No: 69997
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (2)
Votes (2)

 

SlovakiaKentros

Con

13 is the age when boys become men. 13 is the age when people can drink in North Korea, and kim il sung himself said in a statement to his people
"Drinking is cool".
nikolaspajan

Pro

I disagree because ovelesy barack obame iz z bettere presidentz in everay shapeee anz formz, he woulde rekz kim il sunge.
Debate Round No. 1
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by SlovakiaKentros 2 years ago
SlovakiaKentros
Very articulated response to a troll debate.
Posted by americanmade23 2 years ago
americanmade23
the age of 13 for boys is very far from anything that is a being a man. you don't become a man until your mind becomes a man's mind, and at the age of 13 you are now where close to that happening. a boy becomes a man when he starts to act like a man in every way. so, usually a boy becomes a man at the age of like 17-23.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Zarroette 2 years ago
Zarroette
SlovakiaKentrosnikolaspajanTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: Non-debate.
Vote Placed by Proving_a_Negative 2 years ago
Proving_a_Negative
SlovakiaKentrosnikolaspajanTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: This debate was pointless. Con had better grammar.