The Instigator
seacat26
Pro (for)
The Contender
vi_spex
Con (against)

2+2=4 i

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
seacat26 has forfeited round #2.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
00days00hours00minutes00seconds
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/24/2016 Category: Education
Updated: 1 month ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 224 times Debate No: 96381
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (13)
Votes (0)

 

seacat26

Pro

try to prove me wrong
vi_spex

Con

i=life

stones are inanimate
Debate Round No. 1
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 2
13 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by vi_spex 1 month ago
vi_spex
hehe ok
Posted by sboss18 1 month ago
sboss18
My mistake.
Posted by vi_spex 1 month ago
vi_spex
well i agree with that?
Posted by sboss18 1 month ago
sboss18
vi_spex, a variable "x" is not always equal to a single number, it can be any number depending on the context. That's what differentiates variables from constants. Variables change, constants don't.
Posted by vi_spex 1 month ago
vi_spex
i could be used as X and X equal 0 though
Posted by sboss18 1 month ago
sboss18
In a mathematical context, "i" is understood to be the square root of -1, in which case the answer is no, 2+2 does not equal 4i.
Posted by vi_spex 1 month ago
vi_spex
you know what, my truck is out of oil, why dont i go put some liquid poo into it
Posted by BlargArgNarg 1 month ago
BlargArgNarg
What a useless debate...
Posted by vi_spex 1 month ago
vi_spex
2=2 lol
Posted by vi_spex 1 month ago
vi_spex
yes 2=5
This debate has 0 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.