3 divided by 0 is 3
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
gomergcc
Voting Style:  Open  Point System:  7 Point  
Started:  11/28/2014  Category:  Science  
Updated:  2 years ago  Status:  Post Voting Period  
Viewed:  957 times  Debate No:  65971 
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (22)
Votes (1)
3 divided by 0 is 3 because the equation doesn't go through, so you still have 3 and nothing happend, and it can not be explained through and equation so 3/0(3) or just 3
3 divided by 0 is 3 because the equation doesn't go through, so you still have 3 and nothing happend, and it can not be explained through and equation so 3/0(3) or just 3 That is not 3/0=0 That is 3(nothing or 0)=3 0+0+0=0 or 3/0=0 

its impossible to add nothing to something
it can not be an equation, only an explanation, it just means 3
No its a place holder. Not normally used as a single equation. Only small children do just 3+0=0 grown ups use equations like: Rent paid: Jan $395 Feb $0 March $600 or $395+0+$600. Yes this could be done with out the zero but you need the zero when doing rent for 30,000 tenants over the last 20 year or 7,200,000 rent payments. No one can remember the no payments when there is that many numbers to add. 

the value of money is mental, thanks for proving my point
Not just money. Its also how your brain and computer work. Both are in binary so: 1010101010110001 is 2+0+0+0+0+32+64+0+256+0+1024+0+4096+0+16384+0+65536 "3 sodas cant be shared by 0 people, so you have 3 sodas" You not setting up your equation correctly, because your not writing it correctly. Its 3 sodas shared with 0 people, so 0 people have sodas. (Sodas)/(Times shared)=(people I have GIVEN sodas to) Not (sodas)/(Times shared)=(Sodas) or (Sodas)/(Times shared)=(HOW MANY SODAS I HAD) 

0 people are imaginary
That not really a rebuttal. Just a waste of both of our turns. 

an imaginary man cant drink a real soda, destruction is impossible in reality, therefore it can never be a true answer
Your right and that is why the answer is 0.
You have given 0 sodas, to 0 people, 0 times, or 3*0=0. Three non actions have had no effect on anything because they never happened.
The answer only becomes 3 because you are doing this: I have three sodas. I cant give anyone a soda. No one is there. No matter how many times you tell me to. This is 4 variables: I have three sodas: That is 3 for the amount of sodas you have. I cant give anyone a soda: 0 because you have not done any actions because it is not possible to give something tosome one that is not there No one is there: 0 for the amount of people that are there No matter how many times you tell me to: 0 for the amount of times you can complete this loop of events and successfully give someone a soda. This is why your agrument is wrong:
You have expressed this as 3*0=3 in this debate. This only 3 out of the 4 variables. Your missing a number.
In some other debates, on this site, you have used 3*0(3). This is every close to the right answer. () is the same as * in math. So that equation is 3*0*3 that answere is also 0.
The correct way of stating the formual is like this:
You simply add all 4 variables. 3+0+0+0=3
In math we simplify, or try to write the equalition using less characters.
I have 3 and 0,0,0. I can use less characters by expressing that I have 3 zeros.
In math * means the word of. So I have 3 of the zeros.
In math there is no symbol for the word the. I left with a bit of bad grammor with 3 of zero.
We still have 3+ from the beginning of the equation.
So now its 3+3 of zero.
In math we use () to seperate our bad grammer sentaces from the rest of the equation.
That gives us 3+(3 of 0) or 3+(3*0)=3
Your logical agrument word problem is 3+(3*0)=3. This still means 3*0=0

1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Domr 2 years ago
vi_spex  gomergcc  Tied  

Agreed with before the debate:      0 points  
Agreed with after the debate:      0 points  
Who had better conduct:      1 point  
Had better spelling and grammar:      1 point  
Made more convincing arguments:      3 points  
Used the most reliable sources:      2 points  
Total points awarded:  0  1 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro tried to make a mathematical equation into a literal sense. Which would be inaccurate in this case, because Pro stated the Premise was a mathematical equation. 3 divided by 0 is 3 (3/0=3) Mathematically, this equation is "undefined" as you cannot divide by zero.
but infinity can never end, then its not infinite
infinity can never be destruction
Infinity exists in math, and is not a number. It really means infinity.
For example, the limit as 1/x approaches 0 from the right, we get infinity.
The area under e^x" from infinity to +infinity is sqrt(pi).
infinity=beginning without end
eternal=no beginning and no end
eternal is like a round grey rock that flow in endless space, on a beginning less and endless path as a camera follow and film the rock as they flow, where as the camera is filming the rock forever, and looking at the recording would just be seeing a rock flowing, perhaps turning gently at times, just 1 second looping now
It is never infinity. The limit from the left is negative infinity, the limit from the right is positive infinity. The limit does not exist and thus X00; infinity
Vi_spex you're wasting everyone's time.