The Instigator
KJVPrewrather
Con (against)
The Contender
ILUVROBLOX43
Pro (for)

31 states deny adoption rights for rape victims.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
KJVPrewrather has forfeited round #2.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
00days00hours00minutes00seconds
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/29/2017 Category: Politics
Updated: 6 months ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 223 times Debate No: 106228
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (5)
Votes (0)

 

KJVPrewrather

Con

What I mean by adoption rights is the right of a rape victim to place a child for adoption without her rapist's consent. I was raped when I was 22, and this fear stabbed my heart. Pro will go first.
ILUVROBLOX43

Pro

rape is sexy also do you play roblox
Debate Round No. 1
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 2
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 4
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 5
5 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Posted by David-McDermott 6 months ago
David-McDermott
They're definitely right.
Also, thats not what Strawman fallacy is.
Posted by dsjpk5 6 months ago
dsjpk5
I'm not arguing with you, kjv. I'm trying to help you. You've worded your resolution wrong. I'm trying to save you from someone noob sniping this debate and defeating you easily because you've worded it wrong. Either add "Should" to the resolution, or change to Pro.
Posted by kasmic 6 months ago
kasmic
Dsjpk5 is right. The title of your debate is 31 states deny adoption rights for rape victims. You took the position of con which makes it seem that you are arguing that statement. It is a simple fix add the word "should" to the title.
Posted by KJVPrewrather 6 months ago
KJVPrewrather
Strawman. I am con against this practice, but it does exist. READ MY ARGUMENT!
Posted by dsjpk5 6 months ago
dsjpk5
As Con, you are denying that 31 states do thus and so. I think you meant to be Pro. Either that or you should edit the resolution to say "Should states deny rape victims the right to put their babies up for adoption?". Or something similar.
This debate has 6 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.