The Instigator
DATXDUDE
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Morganic
Con (against)
Winning
1 Points

3pac

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Morganic
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 9/11/2015 Category: Arts
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 477 times Debate No: 79645
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (1)
Votes (1)

 

Debate Round No. 1
DATXDUDE

Pro

0 hoots s0n, str8 up. Donn giv no h00ts bout' noWacK a$$ shii]t s0m. Brieh.
Morganic

Con

Definition: legend
G2;lɛdA8;(ə)nd/
noun
1.
a traditional story sometimes popularly regarded as historical but not authenticated.
"the legend of King Arthur"
synonyms:myth, saga, epic, folk tale, folk story, traditional story, tale, story, fairy tale, narrative, fable, romance; More
historical
the story of a saint's life.
"the mosaics illustrate the Legends of the Saints"
2.
an extremely famous or notorious person, especially in a particular field.
"the man was a living legend"

Neither of these definitons apply to 3pac.

Source:
http://www.oxforddictionaries.com...
Debate Round No. 2
DATXDUDE

Pro

Legendary s0n.
https://www.youtube.com...

H00t a$$ BlTCH
Morganic

Con

My opponent makes another excellent point, however after running "3pac" through a Google trends search I discover yet more evidence that "3pac" cannot be described as a "legend" https://www.google.com...
In fact when looking for searches related to "3pac" Google says
"Not enough search volume to show results."

I thank my opponent for his insightful comments and await his response with baited breath.
Debate Round No. 3
DATXDUDE

Pro

gOOGlE? Wh0 neds G000GlE? 3pAc doN't Ned dat shiiet brieh. 0 h00ts #ZHG
Morganic

Con

I rest my case
Debate Round No. 4
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by DATXDUDE 2 years ago
DATXDUDE
midnight you idiot, this was a troll debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Midnight1131 2 years ago
Midnight1131
DATXDUDEMorganicTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro's spelling was atrocious. There are spelling mistakes in every round. And in every round after the third one, it appeared that there were more spelling errors than words. Con on the other hand had good spelling and grammar.