5 rounds represent the limit of admin intelligence, motivation, lack of sense, failure to recognize
Debate Rounds (1)
I have had debates with 4 rounds in the past and wished there was an extra round, not just because I enjoyed the debate but also because I think of new arguments during the debate which I would not have done otherwise.
My opponent thinks "5 rounds represent the limit of admin intelligence, motivation, and lack of sense". A good debater may not need five rounds if they fully understand their opponents view however debate.org caters for every type of debator which is intelligent, as more people can enjoy the site. I don't believe 5 rounds reflect the limit of admins intelligence and motivation, or think that 5 rounds is like limiting a boxing match of the most excellent skilled fighters to 4 seconds in the ring. Debators can set the size limit and time limit of debates, they can also report spam, insults etc to admin so the site can be improved. This shows staff are highly motivated, and resourceful.
All the best in future debates d: )
No votes have been placed for this debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.