The Instigator
BryanMullinsNOCHRISTMAS2
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Mharman
Con (against)
Winning
8 Points

9/11 Never Happened At All

Do you like this debate?NoYes-3
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
Mharman
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/14/2017 Category: Society
Updated: 11 months ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 581 times Debate No: 99899
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (10)
Votes (2)

 

BryanMullinsNOCHRISTMAS2

Pro

9/11 never happened at all, if nobody did it, nothing or any weather made it happen either.
Even though the blame game confusion cycle only says that if we can't blame anybody either because its a conspiracy or it is confusing to tell without bias. the weather never made the towers melt, it was a sunny but cool day. no self-driving planes, no confusion blame, no nothing.
if he said it happen, 9/11 is a lie, look it up:
https://www.youtube.com...
Mharman

Con

Circular reasoning. The logic of it is, we can't tell who did it, so nobody did it, meaning it never happened? Just because we can't tell who did it doesn't mean it never happened. It just means we don't know who did it. It wasn't the weather, it was the fire from the plane crash. The planes weren't self-driving, terrorists hijacked them! If Bobby's block tower gets destroyed by someone, and he didn't see who did it, should he use your logic to deny it ever happened? Sources in comments section.
Debate Round No. 1
10 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by Mharman 11 months ago
Mharman
@Amarandum: You're going to need to explain that vote a little better.
Posted by Mharman 11 months ago
Mharman
@Amarandum: 500 char limit, circular reasoning, this whole debate was bullcrap.
Posted by Amarandum 11 months ago
Amarandum
Pro is either joking, seven, or autistic. Why would you make a one-round debate with a tiny character limit for such a controversial topic? I came here expecting "jet fuel can't melt steel beams" jokes and instead I have this.
Posted by Mharman 11 months ago
Mharman
Also, I would be able to be more specific if had a higher character limit!
>:(
Posted by Mharman 11 months ago
Mharman
Bobby is just a person I made up. It's an example. As for "someone", Bobby sees it happen but he doesn't know who did it. He sees someone's foot kick his tower, but he's not in position to see who he owner of the foot was. By the time he is, the person is gone. He doesn't know who didi it, but it still happened. By your logic it would've never happened, although it did.
Posted by Mharman 11 months ago
Mharman
"Terrorists hijacked them!" has nothing to do with Bobby's story at at all
Posted by BryanMullinsNOCHRISTMAS2 11 months ago
BryanMullinsNOCHRISTMAS2
" terrorists hijacked them! If Bobby's block tower gets destroyed by someone, and he didn't see who did it, should he use your logic to deny it ever happened?"
Really, first of all "terrorists hijack them" that is a part of "nobody CLEARLY did it"
Yes, I would deny that from ever happening because the example you brought is completely and totally irrelevent. Who is "someone" anyway? are you talking about some friend of yours or something, be specific!!! don't just say "somebody"
who is bobby anyway, you need to be more specific about that as well
Posted by Mharman 11 months ago
Mharman
There was really not a lot of space to make a solid argument.
Posted by Gregg_Hyde 11 months ago
Gregg_Hyde
Banter.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by subdeo 11 months ago
subdeo
BryanMullinsNOCHRISTMAS2MharmanTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct was about equal. Pro missed capitalization of letters at sentence start twice, as well as an apostrophe, while con had virtually no errors. Pro and Con both cited one source.
Vote Placed by Amarandum 11 months ago
Amarandum
BryanMullinsNOCHRISTMAS2MharmanTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro, please feel free to challenge me to a lengthier debate on this topic.