The Instigator
JohnnyBadNews666
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Nimbus328
Con (against)
Winning
21 Points

9/11 is a conspiracy.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
Nimbus328
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/31/2013 Category: Politics
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 874 times Debate No: 31939
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (4)

 

JohnnyBadNews666

Pro

Jesse Ventura said so, now DEBATE ME.
Nimbus328

Con

"Immediately after the attacks, the Federal Bureau of Investigation started PENTTBOM, the largest criminal inquiry in the history of the United States. At its height, more than half of the FBI's agents worked on the investigation and followed a half-million leads.[1] The FBI concluded that there was "clear and irrefutable" evidence linking al-Qaeda and bin Laden to the attacks.[2]"[3]

[1] http://www.fbi.gov...
[2] http://web.archive.org...
[3] http://en.wikipedia.org...
Debate Round No. 1
JohnnyBadNews666

Pro

Those are sources from illuminati controlled publications and businesses. Give me a break, and provide REAL CREDIBLE SOURCES THAT AREN'T CONTROLLED BY THE MASS MEDIA. You posting that bunch of crap lets me know that you have no idea about the Jesse Ventura Society of Historical Truth and Reckoning.
Nimbus328

Con

My opponent has yet to provide an understandable position. He believes that there is a conspiracy. However, all he has done thus far is attack my point. Again, there is no clear position from my opponent.

I have provided a valid and credible source. My opponent wants to prove that the FBI is unreliable. I would respectfully point out that the law enforcement agencies are generally the most reliable, especially in matters of national security. Go to the airport. Any airport. Respect is due to the men and women with the badge.

For my side, the evidence points to a through investigation by law enforcement regarding the September 11th attacks.
Debate Round No. 2
JohnnyBadNews666

Pro

Research the Jesse Ventura conspiracy genius and you'll see what I mean.
Nimbus328

Con

My opponent has cited no sources. My opponent has made no argument of substance. Vote Con.
Debate Round No. 3
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by Gondun 4 years ago
Gondun
Could you provide a clearer resolution? I'm not quite sure what you want this debate to be about.
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by TN05 4 years ago
TN05
JohnnyBadNews666Nimbus328Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Wow, what a terrible debate. Con at least tried to argue, but Pro failed to present a legitimate argument or source. His grammar was also much worse than Pro's. All points go to pro.
Vote Placed by Misterscruffles 4 years ago
Misterscruffles
JohnnyBadNews666Nimbus328Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Bald assertions made aggressively do not strong arguments make, young padawan.
Vote Placed by jh1234l 4 years ago
jh1234l
JohnnyBadNews666Nimbus328Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro provided no arguments other than what he thinks.
Vote Placed by johnlubba 4 years ago
johnlubba
JohnnyBadNews666Nimbus328Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Johnnybaddass666, if you want to win a debate you have to strengthen your argument and provide more than just what you think, you need to provide reputable sources that your opponent has a chance to counter argue, as iit stands your argument was very weak and can be considered nothing more than personal opinion.