9spaceking is CON in This Particular Debate
Debate Rounds (4)
The resolution is simple. "9spaceking is CON in This Particular Debate". "This particular debate" refers to this exact debate which you are currently reading. The link can be found here: http://www.debate.org... CON means "the opposing side of the resolution", while PRO means the side going for the resolution. So PRO has to prove 9spaceking is in fact CON in this debate while all I have to do is to give sufficient proof that 9spaceking isn't CON in this debate..
First round acceptance.
BoP is shared.
This debate was supposed to be impossible for Aerogant to accept, but whatever. As can be seen from this debate I am "con", not "CON", therefore I am not CON in this debate but rather "Con".
See? "Con", not "CON". Therefore I have fulfilled my BoP and shown that I ain't CON in this debate, but rather "Con" in this debate.
Nice try though. You remind me of my younger years when I trolled instead thinking about the Universe.
So let's say your name is Herman Schmidt. If I said "HERMAN SCHMIDT", you would not say "I am not HERMAN SCHMIDT. I am Herman Schmidt". No, you would see it as emphasis, because that's what capital letters are: emphasis. A fat person is still a human being, their aesthetics were enlarged, that's it. "CON" is still "Con".
It can be different if you say it in a different way. For example if I yell CON I might be inferring sarcasm and actually mean to say "pro". Besides, that screenshot was a bug, a glitch, an error. Proof after a refreshing shows that I am actually Pro in this debate.
See? I am in reality Pro, not CON.
Thus, I have fulfilled my BoP to show that in fact, I am not CON in this debate, but rather Pro.
When it comes to sarcasm, you cannot definitively argue false intentions in the first place.
What do you mean?? The instigator means the one who starts the debate, and the contender means the one who goes against what the instigator has to say. It looks perfectly fine to me. You're just jealous you don't know how to take a screen-shot. The picture is obviously not photo-shopped.
Again, nice try. But I used to be a troll like you. I had troll friends and was well known for my trolling ability. I was known as the best troll in the world. Now, I'm known as an idiot.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by dynamicduodebaters 2 years ago
|Who won the debate:||-|
Reasons for voting decision: previously read, but was lazy to vote. Semantics, But great ones.
Vote Placed by YaHey 2 years ago
|Who won the debate:||-|
Reasons for voting decision: Con's (or CON's, doesn't really make a difference) argument that they are Con and not CON fell flat and Pro showed it.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.