Miscellaneous Debates

 
Filter By:
Showing: 1 - 10

The user known as Danielle used dishonest tactics in her same-sex parenting debate.

MouthWash
Danielle

Many people on this site know about me and Danielle's same-sex parenting debate, in which she won by a large margin and I accused her of using dishonest arguments (lawyering, strawmen, etc) in order to gain victory.

In case you haven't, here's the link: [http://debate.org/debates/Homosexual-couples-can-raise-children-just-as-well-as-heterosexual-couples./1/]

I...

Post Voting Period
340 Comments
Updated 5 Months Ago

Meta-Ethical Moral Relativism Is An Incoherent Position.

TheSkeptic
Cerebral_Narcissist

I thank Cerebral Narcissist for accepting this debate challenge - it's been a while since my last debate, so I've been eager for another one. My position in this debate is not only is meta-ethical moral relativism unsound, it's logically incoherent. From here on out, I will refer to this position as meta-ethical relativism, and to be more precisely it's abbreviated form MMR. The following is a definition of MMR[1]: "The truth or falsity of moral judgments, or their justification, is not...

Voting Period
194 Comments
Updated 2 Years Ago

My opponent can neither disprove gravity nor an almighty God.

wjmelements
Ragnar_Rahl

"an almighty God" means just that. It is not specifically the God of Abraham, but can also mean a god not worshipped. The concept of an almighty God is what's being debated. "gravity" is the theoretical force that attracts mass together in our universe. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gravity (definition 3) "My opponent" means CON, also known as the contender. "can neither disprove...nor" means not being able to prove false either concept http://www.thefreedictionary.com/dispr...

Post Voting Period
187 Comments
Updated 4 Years Ago

WTC 7 was a controlled demolition

TOMlive
RoyLatham

I am here to scientifically prove the world trade center seven was a controlled demolition. Here are the forces that destroy buildings; Fires Controlled demolition earthquake or an explosion http://www.ae911truth.org/ppt_web/2hour/slideshow.php?i=25 A typical controlled demolition has several characteristics 1. A sudden onset of destruction at base of structure 2. strait down, symmetrical collapse into footprint 3. Demolition waves remove column support 4. Free-fall speed...

Voting Period
142 Comments
Updated 3 Years Ago

The debate.org users monkeyyxxsun and PoeJoe should go on a date

PoeJoe
monkeyyxxsun

I strongly affirm the resolution "The debate.org users monkeyyxxsun and PoeJoe should go on a date". ---- Contention 1: No Practical Problems ---- Let us get the basics out of the way. (1) I am a male, and you are a female. We are both heterosexual. Therefore, there exists no problems as far as sexual preference goes. (2) According to Google Maps, we live (even in 'traffic') within fifteen minutes of each other. There are no problems as far as distance goes. (Although, really: Love h...

Post Voting Period
130 Comments
Updated 4 Years Ago

RESOLVED: The phrase "Equal Opportunity" refers to probability, not possibility.

DanT
Double_R

By accepting this debate, the following definitions are also accepted as part of the resolution.

(adj) equal (having the same quantity, value, or measure as another)
http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=equal

(n) opportunity (a possibility due to a favorable combination of circumstances)
Post Voting Period
126 Comments
Updated 1 Year Ago

My chances of finding a girlfriend are likely less that than of my peers.

DucoNihilum
Labrat228

My argument is simple, the chances of my finding a girlfriend, or a 'partner' (EG, mutual interest with a girl) is less than that of my peers. I will allow at least one round for question / answer session if my opponent chooses to do so. I reserve the right to refuse to answer especially personal or embarrassing questions. For some BG info.... * I am 19 years old * I am a male * I am heterosexual * I have a strong desire for a girlfriend * I have had one girlfriend * We didn't tou...

Post Voting Period
123 Comments
Updated 4 Years Ago

The Cleaners

Kleptin
brittwaller

Everyone knows about vote bombing, which is the practice of a small group pouring all their votes with no justification onto one person. Purposes for doing so may range from just wanting to raise each others' percentages to purposely trashing another person's win rate. Whether or not CWO, as made infamous by the other debate, exists to vote bomb or not, one fact is clear: vote bombing exists. I myself have been victim to it several times. The first few by a single person who made several a...

Voting Period
121 Comments
Updated 4 Years Ago

The fat should be made to buy two seats on planes

brian_eggleston
thisoneguy

I was involved in a rather unpleasant incident on a British Airways flight from Aberdeen to Heathrow recently. (1) The aircraft was an Airbus A319 with a single economy (coach) class cabin which was fitted with seats with a width of 17.0" (2) and the aisle seat I was allocated was located next to a grossly overweight gentleman, whose considerable girth was overflowing onto my seat, thus preventing me from putting the armrest down or fastening my seatbelt. I therefore challenged the man and here...

Voting Period
116 Comments
Updated 4 Years Ago

WriterDave Will Melt Down

WriterDave
royalpaladin


Innomen predicted, when I returned to DDO, that "It's just a matter of time until the next melt down."

Such open-ended predictions are win-win for those who make them; if not proven, they are forgotten, and if proven, the predictor is hailed as a prophet. So this is a way of holding Innomen accountable for his prediction in a manner consistent with the primary dispute mechanism on this website -- as well as holding me accountable for my behavior.

Full Re...

Post Voting Period
113 Comments
Updated 1 Year Ago