Philosophy Debates

 
Sort By:
Showing: 1 - 10

Homosexual Acts are Immoral

Contradiction
WriterDave

TERMSResolved: Homosexual Acts Are ImmoralRounds:1. Acceptance only2. Opening arguments3. Clash4. Closing arguments/clash Definitions: By "homosexual acts" I refer to sexual acts between members of the sa...

Post Voting Period
688 Comments
Updated 2 Years Ago

Life has no unquestionalbe value if there is no God who created all things.

LifeMeansGodIsGood
Strycora

First round is for acceptance and opening statements. My opponent can be atheistic, agnostic, or of whatever faith can be named under the sun. This debate is about the meaning of life. You can see by my screen name what I think the meaning of life is, but this debate is to question my opponents beliefs about the meaning of life,If I clearly show my opponents beliefs are questionable, I should be awarded the points for having the better argument.&nbs...

Post Voting Period
443 Comments
Updated 3 Months Ago

Atheism says there is no God, therefore it is not possible to win Pascal's Wager.

LifeMeansGodIsGood
medv4380

I would like an atheist to argue that it is possible to win Pascal's Wager and remain an atheist at the same time, but it seems to me that an atheist would not argue this way as it allows for the possibility that God is there and atheism excludes that possibility.. A non-atheist can argue this debate against my position. Please give a sample argument in the comments before I allow you to accept this challenge. If you need a dictionary to define words or if you need a web page link to define o...

Post Voting Period
356 Comments
Updated 3 Months Ago

Germans should not be offended when they get called "Nazi" (I think it's a compliment)

Adam2
Fanath

First round is for acceptance but here's a little intro by me: if I was a German I would take the Nazi remark as a compliment. For one, at least that country didn't go around conquering the world the way the Brits and Scandinavian countries did. (And don't even get me started on the way Denmark mistreats Greenland.)As I always say Hitler was much better than these two guys I put who are equal to each other in terms of being a total douche

Post Voting Period
336 Comments
Updated 4 Months Ago

Atheistic Military Men are Proud Brave Fools if not obedient cowardlly fools, and they can be mean.

LifeMeansGodIsGood
Siladheil

Opening round for acceptance with or without an argument from my opponent.Rules.......No vulgarity or sexually explicit comments. Using the word "Hell" as anything other than a noun which describes a literal place of fiery torment in this debate will be considered vulgarity. Cursing in this debate will be considered vulgarity. Violations of these rules are bad conduct and votes must agree. This is expected to be a heated debate between manly men (unless my opponent i...

Post Voting Period
335 Comments
Updated 3 Months Ago

It is better to have never been

Zarroette
Envisage

It is better to have never been Introduction: This is the debate I have always wanted...

Post Voting Period
304 Comments
Updated 3 Months Ago

Homos should not be allowed to vote

LifeMeansGodIsGood
Dishoungh

homos should not be allowed to vote...

Post Voting Period
281 Comments
Updated 5 Months Ago

God most likely exists

zmikecuber
Sswdwm

Good evening/afternoon/morning/midday, ladies and gentlemen. Sswdwm and I don't always see eye-to-eye on issues, and after having many enjoyable forum debates, we've decided to take it to the real thing. The resolution for this debate shall be...God most likely exists.

Post Voting Period
250 Comments
Updated 6 Months Ago

The Problem of Evil falsifies the Christian God's Omnibenevolence

Envisage
Wylted

I am honoured to have Wylted accept this debate! Best of luck to him!.The burden of proof is on me to demonstrate the resolution to be true. I will argue in the following round and Con may provide rebuttals/arguments in the same round.10,000 characters.Round 1: AcceptanceRound 2: Opening arguments, Con may rebut meRound 3: Rebuttals/ArgumentsRound 4: Rebuttals/Conclusions - No new arguments/brand new rebuttalsThat is all, good luck!!...

Post Voting Period
240 Comments
Updated 4 Months Ago

You cannot prove that Bigfoot does not exist

ReformedArsenal
sehyunsohn

Izbo10 appears to think it is possible to prove that a given thing does not exist. For the sake of this debate, we shall use Bigfoot as an example, but you could replace Bigfoot with any other item or entity that is not logically contradictory (A circle with four sides is logically contradictory so you it is not valid, the flying spaghetti monster is not logically contradictory so it would apply). However, he is unwilling to support defend this in debate. I am opening this debate up to anyo...

Voting Period
237 Comments
Updated 3 Years Ago