Philosophy Debates

 
Sort By:
Showing: 1 - 10

I Am Psychic

masterdrave
Varrack

I am a psychic. I've proven it before. Whomever accepts this debate, I will guess their full name (including their middle name) and the members of their family, to prove my case....

Post Voting Period
7 Comments
Updated 11 Months Ago

We know that we are independent,but sometimes we are feeling that we are so far from it.Do you agree

chintu7036
Chicken

We know that we are independent,but sometimes we are feeling that we are so far from it.Do you agree with it or not ?...

Post Voting Period
12 Comments
Updated 3 Years Ago

Whether animals deserve moral treatment.

Prox
AlextheYounga

Con Position: Animals neither have nor deserve rights, or any sort of moral treatment. Specifically, I will be arguing that morality only makes sense with respect to human agents and agents that can/may mimick human intelligence. Animals should only be treated as things or property. My opponent argues that animals should be treated with moral respect. We each will have to posit and defend an ethical philosophy as a framework to consider this issue, along with the issue, itself. Af...

Post Voting Period
6 Comments
Updated 4 Years Ago

How would an atheist prove the existence of color as an asthetic concept to a blind man?

ViceRegent
vardaanbhat

Do atheists know that their physical senses are the only ones? What would they say to a blind man who said there are only four senses, denying the existence of the sense of sight. He demands evidence from you as to the existence of color as an asthetic concept. What would you say?...

Post Voting Period
58 Comments
Updated 2 Months Ago

People should NOT own guns

Mickeymouseman
TUF

People shouldn't own guns. Guns are a problem in society, and result in the death of thousands every year. Whoever accepts this will have to prove how guns are helpful rather tahn a problem. Ican't grasp how anyone could even be for gun rights!...

Post Voting Period
5 Comments
Updated 3 Years Ago

Impossibility exists

Micromann
InVinoVeritas

This debate has been initiated multiple times on DDO, with the win going to both pro and con.[1][2] I hope this debate will be fun for all parties involved and am open to suggestions regarding the rules (and definitions) of this debate. But please do not dispute them in-round.Debate Rules:· Each debater will have 72 hours to post an argument· Each argument will have a maximum of 8,000 c...

Post Voting Period
6 Comments
Updated 4 Years Ago

"Are we humans exactly like stones thrown in a river?"

ImSomebody
InfiniteBears

Rules1. I must argue in favor of the resolution that we humans aren't exactly like stones thrown in a river.2. First round for acceptance.3. BoP is on me; As much as you can prove why we are like humans, if there is at least ONE difference, I win (Hence the resolution ("Exactly")).4. No trolling.Failure to follow these rules will result in a 7-point forfeiture....

Post Voting Period
9 Comments
Updated 2 Years Ago

i am a highly formiddable debater- despite many poor stats

dairygirl4u2c
SPENCERJOYAGE14

if you look at my percentile ranking, im 99+% ranked. it's so high, that you can count numberically, that i'm just under 100th place in the ranking. in a realm of thousands upon thousands, that is not bad at all. if you look at my ELO and win ratio, you might conclude that perhaps i aint so great. i could get into reasons why those are so low, given my laid back nature, but i'm mainly interested in focusing on the stats. also, to be honest, i'm looking for someone with knowledge of h...

Post Voting Period
1 Comments
Updated 2 Years Ago

3 divided by 0 equals 3 - Debate Two

Valkrin
vi_spex

I wish to debate spex on this topic once more (only once), as he still seems unconvinced about this.By agreeing to the debate you agree to the following:72 hours to argue, 8,000 characters max per argument.Any offensive content, including, but not limited to, swearing, derogatory language, and insulting will result in a forfeiture of the debate by the offender.If you wish to state the definition, feel fre...

Post Voting Period
34 Comments
Updated 1 Year Ago

How do atheists rationally know truth from fiction?

ViceRegent
Cluckelite

Atheists love to live under the delusion that they are the guardians of rationality. But how can they hold this title when they cannot even articulate a rational way to know truth from fiction. If they cannot do this, they are literally ignorant and the ignorant cannot guard anything. So, what atheist can give me a rational way atheists know truth from fiction? Answering this question is the sole purpose for this debate. If you are unable or unwilling to answer this question, do not respond...

Post Voting Period
18 Comments
Updated 2 Months Ago