Debates

 
Sort By:
Showing: 1 - 10

fact=personal memory

vi_spex
Ash_RationalTheist

its a fact that i just took a hard drug, im just lying about taking a hard drug...

Debating Period
0 Comments
Updated 15 Minutes Ago

King James Version or NCV, RSV or NIV, does it make a difference?

reddogs

There are only 2 streams of Bible versions, the true text of the Textus Receptus (Majority Text) on which the King James Version is based, and those which picked up the Alexandrian manuscripts (Minority Text), the Codex Alexandrian, Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus which have been shown to have deleted and changed many parts of the text and are unreliable to say the least and purposely corrupted at some key text. The problem is that it is not a 'different translation', it basically is editin...

Challenge Period
0 Comments
Updated 1 Hour Ago

Stop accepting debates with the title 'How do Atheists rationally know truth from fiction?'

Zaephou

Newcomers to Debate.org, DO NOT accept ANY debate with the title 'How do atheists rationally know truth from fiction?'. The guy who has been posting them, ViceRegent, is a middle-aged bigoted ignoramus with the brain capacity of a lemur, and he has been spamming this same debate for months. Please don't accept these debates. If you want, copy and paste this debate and post it yourself to spread the message :)...

Challenge Period
0 Comments
Updated 1 Hour Ago

How do atheists rationally know truth from fiction?

ViceRegent

IF YOU ARE UNABLE OR UNWILLING TO READ THIS WHOLE POST AND THEN RESPOND TO THE SINGLE QUESTION IT ASKS, GO AWAY. I FIND IT HILARIOUS THAT THESE ATHEISTS KEEP VOMITING WORDS AND YET NOT ONE HAS ANSWERED MY Q. Atheists love to live under the delusion that they are the guardians of rationality. But how can they hold this title when they cannot even articulate a rational way to know truth from fiction. If they cannot do this, they are literally ignorant and the ignorant cannot guard anything. SO,...

Challenge Period
0 Comments
Updated 1 Hour Ago

Quote War

MyNameIsJustin
Perussi

This is a short and fun debate. It is currently impossible to join. Please comment why you should participate. I am doing this because since this is in a short fashion, I only want active debaters. Rules: The quotes must be legitimate They must fit the category You must state who said the quote There will be three quotes per round (excluding acceptance round) Format: Round 1: Acceptance Round 2: Liberty Quotes Round 3: Love Quotes Round 4: Work Quotes Comment why I should choo...

Voting Period
16 Comments
Updated 2 Hours Ago

Which came first. The chicken or the egg.

Sonofcharl
CosmoJarvis

Con can choose which side of the argument they wish to debate. 5 open rounds. With a bit of conclusion at the end....

Debating Period
6 Comments
Updated 4 Hours Ago

Is a hell real as in a literal place where people burn forever?

slave123
Danjos162

Hell is not a real place I believe it is a state of mind I don't care what the Bible says or what the Quran says Or what any scripture says It makes no sense that a loving God would throw his own creation in a fiery pit forever! If you have children would you burn your children alive just because they disobey you? Burning people alive is a cruel and unusual punishment Furthermore why forever? If we just sin or so called sin by looking at a beautiful person Why do w...

Debating Period
4 Comments
Updated 4 Hours Ago

Unregulated Capitalism is a moral system, and is perfect as it is

Boris7698
joshuar1996

Many people support are pro capitalism with the proviso "it's not perfect but it works", and that it should be regulated. I claim on the contrary that laissez-faire capitalism, unregulated capitalism, is perfect, and is the best political system. And that there should be no regulation whatsoever. No ECC, FDA, FED etc. And no anti-trust laws. There should be only three things that are responsibilities of the government: the army, the police, and a judicial system. My argument is simple:...

Debating Period
1 Comments
Updated 6 Hours Ago

God definitely does not exist, and the agnostic view is wrong.

Boris7698
AJB1053

God is claimed to be a supernatural being, not merely an alien being from another planet who is powerful. Supernatural means beyond nature. But nature is all of existence, which places God outside of existence, which is impossible. Therefore the concept of God is invalid, because it leads to a contradiction. Everything that exists is part of existence, and therefore is natural. I will debate any Agnostic who grants that God may exist, but no evidence has been provided....

Debating Period
2 Comments
Updated 7 Hours Ago

The Bible is reliable

kwagga_la
Capitalistslave

The Bible is reliable in that it accurately recorded events as it happened. To show that the Bible is unreliable it will be up to Con to show that the Bible contradicts itself. Please use only one or two examples at most per round. Examples must preferably prove that God made an error or contradicted Himself. Humans are able to err. History books contain lots of examples where people lied or made a mistake but that do not make the history unreliable. If more than two arguments are mentio...

Debating Period
4 Comments
Updated 8 Hours Ago