Debates

 
Sort By:
Showing: 1 - 10

It is morally permissible...

Ragnar_Rahl
LR4N6FTW4EVA

The resolution is: "It is morally permissible to use this site to non-satirically advocate that the killing of innocents is both acceptable and unacceptable in the same context." The following is agreed to by every debater on this site: " Will not use the Service in any way to provide material support or resources (or to conceal or disguise the source, location, nature, or ownership of material support or resources) to any organization designated by the U.S. government as a foreign terrori...

Post Voting Period
22 Comments
Updated 5 Years Ago

What is with the fairness act Obama tried passing in 2005?

lalasavannah3218
will2543

So, I heard of this plan he's tried to pass, where radio stations all the public things like that would have to be liberal. I'm not a "republican" and i'm definately not a "democrat" i'm undecided i'm just wondering if you disagree or think this is a little too dramatic that he's trying to do a socialist action by controlling radio stations etc. Thankyou....

Post Voting Period
4 Comments
Updated 5 Years Ago

Schools in the US should ban junk food.

MewxVenus
Darryn_Stylees

I will let the Pro side present their arguments first....

Post Voting Period
4 Comments
Updated 5 Years Ago

The Israeli invasion of the Gaza Strip was Justified (3rd attempt)

Watchman81
Peleus

Okay, I'll try this debate one more time! Maybe the third time's the charm. My position is that Israel's decision to launch military attacks in the Gaza Strips against the terrorist group Hamas is justified. Israel's goal is to achieve a viable peace and to stop the rocket fire. The only way for this to happen is for Israel to destroy as much of Hamas' members and their rockets as possible. It is clearly apparent that Hamas does NOT desire peace with Israel. This is why they continue to la...

Post Voting Period
2 Comments
Updated 5 Years Ago

Bush Lied People Died? Part II

Watchman81
Seerss

Okay, so I tried this debate once, but didn't get a good opponent. Hopefully this one will work better. Here is my opening argument. In this debate, I am arguing that President Bush did NOT lie in order to justify the United State's invasion of Iraq. Whether or not the United State's invasion of Iraq was justifiable or not is irrelevant to this debate. I am arguing against the popular belief that Bush used deception in order to justify the US' invasion of Iraq. The reason we went to war wa...

Post Voting Period
2 Comments
Updated 5 Years Ago

Schools ought to replace textbooks with a digital medium.

MitchellDeYoung
Protagoras

I will allow the negative to have the first say....

Post Voting Period
13 Comments
Updated 5 Years Ago

Marijuana legalization for medicinal purposes ought to occur

methodicalmadness00
Kleptin

Defer to aff for constructive LD style if possible....

Post Voting Period
4 Comments
Updated 5 Years Ago

Vigilantism is Justified when govermnment has failed to enforce the law

TheCategorical
Metz

Affirmation V: Societal welfare VC: Will to Power of societal order Thesis: The will to power is an individual's struggle against their surroundings that culminates in personal growth, and the ability to assert power. Vigilantism is justified through this struggle against the crime that has been committed. In Will to Power Nietzsche writes: "My idea is that every specific body strives to become master over all space and to extend its force (its will to power) and to thrust back all that resi...

Post Voting Period
24 Comments
Updated 5 Years Ago

Virus is good

arcticantics
arcticanticsdebater

I will let my opponent go first...

Post Voting Period
7 Comments
Updated 5 Years Ago

You should not be allowed to vote on a debate that you participated in.

James.ticknor
ToastOfDestiny

Observation 1: I have the burdon of clash, my opponent has the burdon of proof. Prove it. Observation 2: In no way will the participate be allowed to vote or influence voters with propaganda, just factual information. I will now begin. Contention 1: Participants being allowed to vote retains the possibility of biased decisions. The entire debate outcome is therefore jeprodized and subject to pointless arguementations; it means nothing if there is no truth in a vote. I do not believe...

Post Voting Period
15 Comments
Updated 5 Years Ago