Philosophy Debates

 
Sort By:
Showing: 91 - 100

Language is the transcendental signified.

Dubs_for_whatevs
chesslvr

God has been superseded by man who has been now overturned by language. The transcendental signified as it should be interpreted in the context of this debate, is a conception of that which grants things meaning from some external origin. (Science, religion, psychology, rationality, anthropology etc.) I claim that language is precisely the singularity from which everything is conceived and therefore properly valued. I suspect there are going to be women trying to follow this debate because th...

Post Voting Period
8 Comments
Updated 3 Years Ago

The Sky Is Blue

Liquidus
CAPLlock

I will be willing to argue against the sky being blue. Since we all know that the sky is in fact blue, this should be a simple debate, however, I will still be willing to debate it. Rule:Do not try the "because everybody agrees on it, its true fallacy".This obviously is for fun....

Post Voting Period
6 Comments
Updated 3 Years Ago

God loves you.

LifeMeansGodIsGood
ChosenWolff

The Con postion for this debate is "God does not love me". "God is not there", or "there is no proof that God is there" are unacceptable arguments for this debate and will be automatic forfeiture. If you cannot argue that God does not love you without saying "there is no God" or "there is no proof of God", Please do not accetpt this challenge. If Con, in the debate or in the comments, says "you can't know God is there" or "God is not there" or "there is no proof of God" or any such denial or neg...

Post Voting Period
167 Comments
Updated 1 Year Ago

Germans should not be offended when they get called "Nazi" (I think it's a compliment)

Adam2
Fanath

First round is for acceptance but here's a little intro by me: if I was a German I would take the Nazi remark as a compliment. For one, at least that country didn't go around conquering the world the way the Brits and Scandinavian countries did. (And don't even get me started on the way Denmark mistreats Greenland.)As I always say Hitler was much better than these two guys I put who are equal to each other in terms of being a total douche

Post Voting Period
336 Comments
Updated 1 Year Ago

The Fool: I will refute any argument considered a sound proof of God

The_Fool_on_the_hill
yuiru

Rational/reasonable: To think incoherence with logic.1. Arguments must be intellegentally defended by the Debators. 2. Appeal to authorty or references are NOT replacements for Arguments.3. Principle of Charity=Conduct4. The Debate is for Intellectual truth value rather then debate value.Principle of Charity-respe...

Post Voting Period
66 Comments
Updated 3 Years Ago

What political system do you believe in?

Maxx
Jifpop09

Left or right? down or up? intricate or simple? rational or emotional tell me YOUR BELIEFS and opinions, I want to know(I going to NEED to know If I want be a leader)...

Post Voting Period
7 Comments
Updated 1 Year Ago

I think, therefore I am

chit0wn
t-man

I am against the validity of the statement, "I think, therefore I am." I, con, am proving why the statement is false, and pro is proving why the statement is true. 1st round is acceptance, 2nd through 4th have no rules. In this case, I is defined as the identity of self, or ego. Think is defined as having thoughts....

Post Voting Period
15 Comments
Updated 3 Years Ago

Atheists.

Max.Wallace
KhalifV

Islam is Atheism, as the Islamists believe Man is god. Welcome to the truth....

Post Voting Period
17 Comments
Updated 2 Months Ago

Feminism will lead to world changes

Batman13
rross

Feminism is a collection of movements and ideologies aimed at defining, establishing, and defending equal political, economic, and social rights for women. Patriarchy has been existed for many years and now it's matriarchy time. I believe that women will change the world for better....

Post Voting Period
3 Comments
Updated 2 Years Ago

Are Religious people insane?

qopel
AlbinoBunny

Definition of insane: Not having or showing reason, not sound judgment, or good sense No claiming "something can't come from nothing". Nobody has ever had a "nothing" to examine, so it can't even be defined what a "nothing" is. No claiming "everything must have a cause". Causality didn't exist until after the Bing Bang, which means the Big Bang could have happened without a cause. No claiming the Universe came from nothing. The Universe came from a singularity, which is something. Accord...

Post Voting Period
82 Comments
Updated 2 Years Ago