Philosophy Debates

 
Sort By:
Showing: 91 - 100

People should eat much less meat

MistyBlue
mistersilver

Rules: 1. Polite conduct at all times 2. A picture or cartoon with every argument (just to be entertaining :D ) I will be arguing that people should eat a lot less meat or become vegetarian, Con will be arguing that meat is beneficial to the human diet. First round is acceptance.......

Post Voting Period
4 Comments
Updated 3 Years Ago

God Probably Does Not Exist

Rational_Thinker9119
Gabe1e

A maximally great, omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent God (with a capital "G") is the one we will be discussing about.First round for acceptance only....

Post Voting Period
6 Comments
Updated 3 Years Ago

You should follow stoic principles.

poppinoffgrounds
ashtronomy

I'm advocating that you should follow stoic principles; chiefly, the principles of apathy which is the basis of all stoic philosophy: one should neither suffer pain nor pleasure. The reason why stoics advocate this is because they believe humans incorrectly assume that pleasure is good and pain is to be avoided; instead of actually determining what pleasures are good, they bypass the issue by simply saying that you should not be a victim of them. For the stoics the possibility of being a victim...

Post Voting Period
0 Comments
Updated 4 Years Ago

How do atheists rationally know truth from fiction?

ViceRegent
dr.jimmythefish

IF YOU ARE UNABLE OR UNWILLING TO READ THIS WHOLE POST AND THEN RESPOND TO THE SINGLE QUESTION IT ASKS, GO AWAY. I FIND IT HILARIOUS THAT THESE ATHEISTS KEEP VOMITING WORDS AND YET NOT ONE HAS ANSWERED MY Q. Atheists love to live under the delusion that they are the guardians of rationality. But how can they hold this title when they cannot even articulate a rational way to know truth from fiction. If they cannot do this, they are literally ignorant and the ignorant cannot guard anything. SO,...

Post Voting Period
2 Comments
Updated 9 Months Ago

Private property as a right

Capitalistslave
LaL36

Con(me): arguing that private property is not a rightPro: arguing that private property is a right.I believe burden of proof lies with pro, to be honest. While it probably seems like a no brainer that property is a right to most of us, none of us has probably questioned it, or wondered why. The reason why the burden of proof lies with pro is because it is an affirmative statement, whereas to say it is not a right is a negation. There needs to be reason why private pr...

Debating Period
4 Comments
Updated 8 Months Ago

How do atheists rationally know truth from fiction?

ViceRegent
JSMG

IF YOU ARE UNABLE OR UNWILLING TO READ THIS WHOLE POST AND THEN RESPOND TO THE SINGLE QUESTION IT ASKS, GO AWAY. I FIND IT HILARIOUS THAT THESE ATHEISTS KEEP VOMITING WORDS AND YET NOT ONE HAS ANSWERED MY Q. Atheists love to live under the delusion that they are the guardians of rationality. But how can they hold this title when they cannot even articulate a rational way to know truth from fiction. If they cannot do this, they are literally ignorant and the ignorant cannot guard anything. SO,...

Post Voting Period
2 Comments
Updated 8 Months Ago

How do atheists rationally know truth from fiction?

ViceRegent
Dirty-Morgs

IF YOU ARE UNABLE OR UNWILLING TO READ THIS WHOLE POST AND THEN RESPOND TO THE SINGLE QUESTION IT ASKS, GO AWAY. I FIND IT HILARIOUS THAT THESE ATHEISTS KEEP VOMITING WORDS AND YET NOT ONE HAS ANSWERED MY Q. Atheists love to live under the delusion that they are the guardians of rationality. But how can they hold this title when they cannot even articulate a rational way to know truth from fiction. If they cannot do this, they are literally ignorant and the ignorant cannot guard anything. SO,...

Debating Period
5 Comments
Updated 8 Months Ago

Are Atheists Able to Know Reality from Delusion?

ViceRegent
Scruggs

Atheists love to live under the delusion that they are the guardians of rationality. But how can they hold this title when they cannot even articulate a rational way to know truth from fiction. If they cannot do this, they are literally ignorant and the ignorant cannot guard anything. So, what atheist can give me a rational way atheists know truth from fiction? Answering this question is the sole purpose for this debate. If you are unable or unwilling to answer this question, do not respond t...

Post Voting Period
5 Comments
Updated 9 Months Ago

Why is a Raven Like a Writing Desk?

Pest
Sonofcharl

Why is a raven like a writing desk? My answer: Relativity. But I am pro: Writing Desk....

Debating Period
0 Comments
Updated 8 Months Ago

Is the New Testament theologically immoral?

Smerdyakov
thelonelymoutain

Okay, I'm going to keep this short and sweet. If I had to write a book where I expose a unique hole in doctrine for each religion, Christianity would get the following: "Pathological inability to accept the adherent good nature of man and utter incapability of an idea that dictates love can only come from god to man and NOT vice versa. To sum it up, Christianity demonises human nature in its very foundations. It CAN'T accept the fact that not every human needs a higher power to be morally good."...

Debating Period
8 Comments
Updated 7 Months Ago