Philosophy Debates

 
Sort By:
Showing: 91 - 100

Am I really an attack helicopter?

helicopter
thatguywelbs

I sexually Identify as an Attack Helicopter. Ever since I was a boy I dreamed of soaring over the oilfields dropping hot sticky loads on disgusting foreigners. People say to me that a person being a helicopter is Impossible and I"m f*cking retarded but I don"t care, I"m beautiful. I"m having a plastic surgeon install rotary blades, 30 mm cannons and AMG-114 Hellfire missiles on my body. From now on I want you guys to call me "Apache" and respect my right to kill from above and kill needlessly. I...

Debating Period
7 Comments
Updated 2 Months Ago

Logic is unuasable

Beyacth
aesopstabili

Logic is unusable. Why? Because my emotions tell me so. This makes logic unusable, since I feel like it. Oh! But what is that? By you going against my argument, you are defending logic with logic. And in so called "logic", that is circular reasoning? ISNT IT?? HAHAHAHA FIGHT ME BITCH!!! LOGIC IS DEAD AND UNUSABLE AND OBSOLETE...

Debating Period
2 Comments
Updated 2 Months Ago

Why do I not have FRIENDS!!!!!

VeganBeefBurrito
themarryonet

Can u be mai frend?...

Debating Period
1 Comments
Updated 3 Months Ago

Humans have free will?

CelsoMoskowitz
StarTrek_is_Trash

Definition Free will - the ability to act in a way that cannot, even if hypothetically, be predicted. No rules. Let's go....

Debating Period
2 Comments
Updated 3 Months Ago

Do Extremist Thiests get to Heaven?

PowerPikachu21
CelsoMoskowitz

I've been seeing various theists, and some might be taking their side a bit too far. So I'm wondering... Are these Extremist Theists doing what God wanted? Would they reach Heaven?Definitions:Extremist Thiest; A follower of God who usually is against the idea of Athiesm.Heaven; A place created by God to reward good people with endless life. [I'll admit I need to research about the subject]Rules:1) The resolution is...

Debating Period
5 Comments
Updated 3 Months Ago

Rationality is Good

Oooo
StarTrek_is_Trash

I believe that rationality is good because......a) Why should we let society be destroyed by simple human nature? Shouldn't we let the empirical judgements of rationality rule over us? While it might mean seeing things we don't like, the effects, no matter how emotionally scarring the content is, and any interpretation is this is fair game because it doesn't matter how it was intended, the empirical content of the speech, what matters is the receiving of said speech....

Debating Period
3 Comments
Updated 3 Months Ago

Can guilt be separated from the idea of debt?

TheUnexaminedLife
hugojoy

Nietzsche argues that all guilt and 'bad conscience' first derives from this notion of 'debt'. Was he right?...

Post Voting Period
30 Comments
Updated 3 Months Ago

All ideas are a logical interpretation of emotion

mschechtel17
CosmoJarvis

I present that all original ideas are a logical and practical interpretation of a certain feeling or emotion. Specifically that the formation on an idea takes place with an undeniable relationship to emotion and is expressed in the physical world to either prevent a specific emotion or in reaction to a specific emotion. An example of how this could happen is as follows: A stimulus elicits an emotion -> the human mind interprets that emotion to form an idea -> then the human person expresses that...

Post Voting Period
6 Comments
Updated 2 Months Ago

It is time to scrap our basic political structure starting with the Two-Party System

mschechtel17
wrinkledinkle

I present the idea that our current political structuring at the federal level is no longer the best fit for the Era we currently find ourselves in. Specifically the Two-Party system paradigm is incapable of accurately representing the diversity of ideas in America. I don't have an exact political system to replace the Two-Party system with, but will argue that a new one should be created. This is a free-form debate. I will argue for the Pro Just accept and state your argument and r...

Debating Period
4 Comments
Updated 3 Months Ago

Did Joseph Stalin ruin Communism?

Avelvetnightmare
DrIVanHopekins

Hello comrades, My argument today is how Joseph Stalin, possibly the most famous Communist in world history, kept the Soviet Union from being the best country it could have been and effectively tainted communism with his reign, changing its ideology for the worse and negatively influencing the future of communism. Here are my reasons: 1. Lack of Equality One of the very core beliefs of Marxism is the destruction of Social Classes and the rights and powers of the Individual. As well as c...

Debating Period
9 Comments
Updated 3 Months Ago