Philosophy Debates

 
Filter By:
Showing: 91 - 100

We live only once.

hilton16
glowingdisco

What is life? What's our sole purpose of life? We live only once, a debate for centuries to come. I've had a constant battle with myself, and i just can't seem to find a answer? only to end up asking myself more questions and answer my own questions.

I look forward to debating anyone. This debate is about logic base thinking. This is debate is a burden of proof on both of us for one cannot prove or give any evidence that we live only once. But this debate is to g...

Post Voting Period
5 Comments
Updated 1 Month Ago

Occam's Razor Exploits Goodwill

Daktoria
Lizard

This is a simple argument that explains the problem with tolerating Occam's Razor in debate. For those unfamiliar, Occam's Razor is the idea that among plausible explanations, the simplest one should be chosen: http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/occam.html http://science.howstuffworks.com/innovation/scientific-experiments/occams-razor.htm http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/OCCAMRAZ.html The problem with Occam's Razor is it allows people to claim possibilities as sufficient reason for wh...

Post Voting Period
7 Comments
Updated 2 Months Ago

General Theism Contains a True Proposition for God's Existence

ChristusExemplar
bladerunner060

(1) Defining Theism I will define traditional (or according to the resolution, 'general') theism as the following: "There exists necessarily a person without a body who necessarily is eternal, perfectly free, omnipotent, omniscient, perfectly good, and the creator of all things" (R. Swinburne, 'The Existence of God'; p. 6). Dr. Rick Cornish further expounds, "Theism believes that one infinite, personal God is the ultimate reality... this God created the universe, disclosed Himself to mank...

Post Voting Period
2 Comments
Updated 2 Months Ago

Shared BoP Is Elitist

Daktoria
Lizard

This debate is about the characteristic of burden of proof in public policy debates. To demonstrate, Con and Pro will pretend to be two people actually participating in a social program. Con will be a "strong" person. Pro will be a "weak" person. Before participation, Pro was skeptical of the social program necessarily being safe and respectful. Pro did not have evidence in advance of experience which proved the social program's unreliability, so was forced to "go with the program"....

Post Voting Period
2 Comments
Updated 2 Months Ago

Objective Morality Necessitates a Higher Being

pastimpasse
philochristos

Respond with an introductory argument in your first response, respond to specific points in mine with your second. I will do the same. Clarification: The ambiguous term "higher being" does not necessarily denote a god, but rather any being with cognitive capacity which surpasses that of a human in that it can conceive of an objective morality. This role is usually assigned to a god but does not necessarily have to be. First, consider that humans have yet to come to to total consensus on any m...

Post Voting Period
12 Comments
Updated 2 Months Ago

Is prolonged empire a good thing?

Scoeri
Daktoria

I personally am in favor of empire, but I would like to hear the opinions of others and what they think. Please realize that empires aren't inherently malevolent, can be any form of government (aside from things like anarchy), and still exist in the modern day. For example some modern day empires would be China, Russia, the U.S.A., and Brazil. Other than that, I am interested in what you have to say....

Post Voting Period
2 Comments
Updated 2 Months Ago

Should socrates have drank the hemlock

seoaned
k_torres7

Purpose of debate is to define our reasons, "Why Socrates should have by drank the hemlock" or the opposite, "Why should he have not drunk the hemlock". R1. Why did we decide to chose our side of the debate. R2. Explanation R3. Rebuttal. R4. Conclusion of each side. Socrates was a man of integrity and never wronged the community of Athens at least not intentionally. Plato referenced a gadfly to demonstrate Socrates stirring up Athens to make them think as a gadfly would sting a horse an...

Post Voting Period
0 Comments
Updated 2 Months Ago

That the mind is a purely physical substance.

113086
philochristos

Full Resolution:
That the mind is a purely physical substance, existing in the brain and that all dualist accounts supposing the existence of a non-physical soul are false.
Rules:
1. A forfeit or concession is not allowed.
2. No semantics, trolling, or lawyering.
3. All arguments and sources must be visible inside this debate.
4. Debate resolution, definitions, rules, and structure cannot be changed without asking in the comme...

Post Voting Period
4 Comments
Updated 2 Months Ago

Should Socrates Drink The Hemlock?

riosk1
DaveCandia

I believe that Socrates should't have drank the hemlock. Many think he should of as David Hume states in "On Suicide" that "If suicide be criminal, it must be a transgression of our duty to either God, our neighbor, or ourselves." Thus meaning that Socrates must not believe in a God for him to kill himself with no guilt. However in "Apology" Socrates makes refference to his spiritual teachings and spirit guide who he feels watches him, and also states he does believe in a God. With that being sa...

Post Voting Period
0 Comments
Updated 2 Months Ago

Should Socrates have drank the hemlock?

Sitkoc
MichaelSmith4

Socrates took the correct course of action by drinking the hemlock. If he had not, he would have only confirmed his guilt, and made a hypocrite of himself, by turning his back on his own teachings. At the age of eighteen, Athenians were presented with the choice to leave the city, if they did not wish to follow the laws of the city. Socrates was well-advanced in his age, over seventy years old, the choice to depart the city had long since past, and thus, he made his bed now he must lie in it. If...

Post Voting Period
0 Comments
Updated 2 Months Ago