Philosophy Debates

 
Sort By:
Showing: 91 - 100

if you were alone with someone, n there was no way 2 get food, u can morally kill an eat that person

linate
SocialistAtheistNutjob

if you were alone with someone, n there was no way 2 get food, u can morally kill an eat that person. consider a deserted island hypothetical or maybe stranded in the desert w no end in clear site, or something like that. the normal rules of not being able to kill others at this point no longer applies....

Post Voting Period
5 Comments
Updated 2 Weeks Ago

'defense of others' 2 limited in practice, killing serial killer bob isnt inherently immoral

linate
blackkid

'defense of others' 2 limited in practice, killing serial killer bob isnt inherently immoral bob is a serial killer on the run and's shown every reason he'll continue killing. you see him by chance at a state park. a high reason to think if you try to call authorities he will get away. u have a gun- moral to kill him? remember, 'defense of others' as a legal and moral system is often said to be only permissible if the pending harm to another is 'imminent' which usually is said to mean 'rig...

Post Voting Period
0 Comments
Updated 2 Weeks Ago

Science, by itself, can determine moral truths

BaruchSpinoza
rings48

Round 1: acceptance only Round 2: opening statements (reserve rebuttals for round 3) Round 3: rebuttals Round 4: closing statements (no new arguments) I mean science to include the whole of the natural and social sciences, and more specifically any practice in which beliefs are primarily determined by hypothesis-testing and rigorous collection of empirical data. I mean morality to be the abstract system of values used to judge human affairs. I am not referring to actual moral practices...

Post Voting Period
3 Comments
Updated 2 Weeks Ago

The purpose of life is to create life.

cargiannis
Aerogant

The title is my argument....

Post Voting Period
37 Comments
Updated 3 Weeks Ago

Abortion is morally wrong.

el_ginger
SocialistAtheistNutjob

I believe that abortion is morally wrong if you are an evolutionist or a christian. Round 1: Acceptance and opening statement Round 2: Opening arguements/rebuttles Round 3: Rebuttles Round 4: Arguements and rebuttles Round 5: Rebuttles and closing statements I look forward to a civilized debate :)...

Voting Period
8 Comments
Updated 1 Week Ago

Redistributive Justice

bsh1
EndarkenedRationalist

PrefaceI have been looking forward to this debate for some time. It should be fun. Thanks to Endark for agreeing to take me up on this issue!TopicIn many cases, Justice requires the Redistribution of Resources.Rules1. No forfeits2. Any citations or foot/endnotes must be provided in the text of the debate3. No new arguments in the final round4. Maintain a civi...

Debating Period
10 Comments
Updated 16 Hours Ago

druken shood be good en world me ladeeh

J03ybatts
FuzzyCatPotato

Ehh ladeehs eets batts. I want ta talk to ya aboot me ole tradeecion of drenkin good el ber. Na whn i get hungrey i go n' get me some ars am ih right? meh irus sausage hangs down to meh knees n' who dont likea good fackin? onley ting that makee a good ol fackin better tis some goud el ber. me mayo be sprayin out me sausag n da ber is so goud i weesh upun a stur a bear woud fack me up da bum? pleese explain why drunk is no good en da hole worl? rooles: 1. fack oof con 2. noo bein a wee p...

Post Voting Period
0 Comments
Updated 3 Weeks Ago

pacifism is just as bad as warmongering

leonitus2464
BaruchSpinoza

my position is that pacifism is just as bad as instigating and unjust war. round 1: acceptance round2/3 : debate...

Post Voting Period
3 Comments
Updated 3 Weeks Ago

Anarchy is unsustainable

Cold-Mind
J03ybatts

Resolution: People living in anarchy will at some point create some sort of government if their land is not occupied and people are not wiped out.Anarchy: Land with no government.BoP is shared.Rules: Images and videos can not be posted.Links can only be posted as evidence/source for challenged premises.No forfeits allowed.Round 1 is acceptance only. Con must not make new original arguments in Round 4.Round 5 is conclusio...

Post Voting Period
7 Comments
Updated 2 Weeks Ago

Transhumanism

Cold-Mind
Samuel60

Pro's resolution: We(humans) should embrace transhumanism and not resist it.Con's resolution: We should do our best trying to put an end to transhumanism.Forfeit in Round 1, 2 or 3 means loss. BoP is on both (obviously). Con can make arguments in first round. Con must not make new premises in Round 4....

Post Voting Period
12 Comments
Updated 3 Weeks Ago