Science Debates

 
Sort By:
Showing: 91 - 100

Should we continue to fund NASA?

DebaterDracon
seanic

Aloha my fellow debaters! I come to you all with a topic that has been discussed before, but not too recently. It's a topic I would really love to see discussed once more. Now then, onto the rules and regulations:1. This is an open debate. Anyone may challenge my position on this topic.2. Should you forfeit at any...

Post Voting Period
2 Comments
Updated 1 Month Ago

Bengal tiger vs Asiatic lion

KingMonarch
cam25aus

This debate was issued several times on this site, and most of the time the opposing side didn't have any arguments so they let the time expire before any verdict was made, so if you are not willing to answer thoroughly, then do not except the challenge. I stand by what previous others have stated regarding the lion. The lions advantages out weighs the tigers and the lions advantages are: Pro: - Stronger at striking - Has a protective mane - Is more experienced at fighting - Is more...

Voting Period
1 Comments
Updated 1 Month Ago

Hauntings are objectively real, but ghosts are not!

squarepeg
NOTRANSENXD

We assert: The trigger and mechanism that result in the subjective experience (traditionally labeled "ghosts and haunting phenomenon") are objectively real, require only three elements to produce the target phenomenon (a haunting), and will affect specific genotypes (MAOA gene variants) diversely and according to types. Con-specific markers, resulting from human biological contamination of the environment, activate "high affinity" (TAAR) receptors, long before conscious awareness occurs, if eve...

Post Voting Period
12 Comments
Updated 1 Month Ago

Not ebing able to find evidence does not mean that there is none

GoOrDin
TheOregonian

Just because YOU Personally are unable to find evidence does not mean that evidence Does not exist. Someone can not claim that, " There is NO evidence" of something. That is an arrogant not ignorant claim. "To that which you are ignorant you shall not make claims." This refers to all scientific method in evaluating anything from religion, chemistry and literature, to things like thieves and germs. I call BIGOT on everyone who claims there is NO evidence God exists simply because they...

Post Voting Period
12 Comments
Updated 1 Month Ago

the sun causes cancer

buildthatwall
TheRussian

my argument is that any kind of exposure to the star closest to our planet, the sun, causes cancer. it is a fact that every person to every get cancer has been exposed to sun light in some way. the evidence is in argueable if u are exposed to sunlight you will for sure 100% get cancer. stay inside kids and remember to build that wall. don't even try to counter argue me you will lose...

Post Voting Period
13 Comments
Updated 1 Month Ago

How does a person rationally know reality from nothing

Ceaser_6.0
Petfish

Humans love to live under the delusion that they are the guardians of rationality. But how can they hold this title when they cannot even articulate a rational way to know reality from nothing. If they cannot do this, they are literally ignorant and the ignorant cannot guard anything. So, what human can give me a rational way humans know truth from fiction?And please do not respond if you have responded before or if you admit you have no way of rationally know...

Post Voting Period
1 Comments
Updated 1 Month Ago

Time Travel

Blade0886
MilindianaJones

If anyone else is interested in taking up the debate, say it in comments or via PM.RulesFirst round is for acceptance and definitions only. If you want to challenge a definition I made, please talk about it in the comments first before posting your round.No semanticsBOP is sharedNo kriticsIf either side can't post an argument in time, he/she must not forfeit the ro...

Post Voting Period
5 Comments
Updated 1 Month Ago

Genetically Modified Foods do more good than harm.

BenJWasson
mmelaku

Hello, my name is Ben. I am on the Pro side of this resolution, and I personally believe the same. I challenge mmelaku to this debate as he is my friend and peer. Some rules: 1. No forfeits 2. Sources may be provided in the comments 3. No new arguments in the final round 4. Maintain a civil and decorous atmosphere 5. No trolling 6. First round is for acceptance only 7. Violation of any rules is an automatic loss First round is for acceptance only. Thank you....

Post Voting Period
5 Comments
Updated 1 Month Ago

The earth is flat

Edlvsjd
Ayden_Linden

The earth is flat. I have researched the subject for 6 months now, and there are more proof on the side of a flat earth then I can find on a spherical one. The debate format shall be as follows. Round one is acceptance. In round 2, I state my argument, and con can either use this round for rebuttal or state arguments against the flat earth. Round 3 is for rerebuttals, and further arguments, if possible. Round 4 is strictly for the bottles and round 5 should be used for conclusion and furthe...

Voting Period
12 Comments
Updated 1 Month Ago

Is it reasonable to question the theory of evolution?

Conspiracyrisk
JayShay

This is a re-do of a previous debate I had with Jay Shay. We would have finished the debate, but life got in the way and I had to forfeit the last two rounds. We will simply be copy-pasting the arguments we made. ____________________________________________________________________________________________ For this debate, I will not necessarily be trying to prove evolution is false, nor will I be trying to prove there is a god. For this debate, I will simply be trying to prove that it is reas...

Post Voting Period
11 Comments
Updated 1 Month Ago