Science is the study of God.
Science is the study of God. For this argument God "is". Science: The observation, identification, description, experimental investigation, and theoretical explanation of phenomena. Or you could even say; The study of what is....
Cloning
I was recently assigned a persuasion paper for school. My chosen topic is cloning. Before I began my research I knew very little about the topic, only that it was highly controversial. But after only some beginning research I now believe otherwise. Cloning is a process that should be continued. I feel this way because cloning has many health benefits. Such as, cloning can be used to clone failing organs to replace old, or damaged ones. Also, by cloning a child from a single parent hereditary d...
The Modern Evolutionary Synthesis is a Reliably Predictive Model.
[Defintiion - Reliable] http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/reliable -That may be relied on; dependable in achievement, accuracy, honesty, etc. [Definition - Predictive] http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/predictive 1. Of or pertaining to prediction: losing one's predictive power. 2. Used or useful for predicting or foretelling the future: to look for predictive signs among the stars. [Definition - Model] http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/model -A systematic descr...
Macroevolution is a Scientifically Correct Explanation for the Diversity of Life on Earth.
I've started a couple of debates that cover subtopics of the Evolution vs. Creationism "controversy". It comes up often in such debates that Creationists will tote Microevolution is scientifically backed up, while Macroevolution isn't. They state that speciation isn't possible, and thus evolution can not be true. The intent of this debate is to show whether or not Macroevolution is grounded and proven with science. *Contentions* 1. Transitional Fossils. 2. Comparative Anatomy. That's...
is global warming entirely caused because of man
First let ,me tell you that i'am not a critic who likes to insult mankind as i also am a human being.But we must all agree to this that we are the sole responsible cuase of this heated conversation of global warming.If man had'nt made machines pollution would not have been burdening mother earth and its pitful reatures on a sad note i would conclude by saying man has caused these broblems and we should be the ones solving it too!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!...
A debate on a topic that I am not mentioning in the topic line.
Alright, to kill the suspense, the topic is "Global Warming is caused by mankind's actions." I negate of course. Since PRO has the burden, I'll let him go first....
Cloning should stay banned
Cloning shoould be banned because the idea goes against the bible. In Genesis chapter 1 God created Earth and the stars, animals, and man. God created life not us, so God is the only one that should create humans not us make copies of ourselves. Although there are numerous medical advances that would happen if we could clone. They would be human so any testing we would do on them would be the same as testing on you or me. The art of cloning hasn't been fixed yet. 1 or 2 out of 100 of the c...
Dihydrogen Monoxide should be banned
Based from research completed at the United States Environmental Assessment Center, Dihydrogen monoxide: • is also known as hydric acid, and is the major component of acid rain. • contributes to the Greenhouse Effect. • may cause severe burns. • accelerates corrosion and rusting of many metals. • may cause electrical failures and decreased effectiveness of automobile brakes. • has been found in excised tumors of terminal cancer patients. Additionally, dihydrogen monoxide is foun...
1 can be proven to have the same value as 0.9999999etc.
Good day to you, opponent, and to you, the voter 1 and .99999etc can be proved to be the same, and have the same value. In other words, they are equivalent. If you disagree with my statement, please accept this debate and tell me why....
The Big Bang theory is not a sufficient explanation for creation.
Basically, I'm saying that the Big Bang theory cannot be completely true, in short, the world could not have been created solely through the Big Bang. Just a quick parameter, this debate is really geared towards science and physics rather than metaphysics, as I only have time for a short debate. According to the Big Bang model, the universe expanded from an extremely dense and hot state and continues to expand today. A common and useful analogy explains that space itself is expanding, carryin...