Science Debates

 
Filter By:
Showing: 101 - 110

Metaphysics Debate 3

LR4N6FTW4EVA
Vi_Veri

Okay, I feel like debating metaphysical stuff, but I don't know which, so here are some topics, if you want to go PRO for the topics I list, we can change them to the negative, so as not to confuse anyone. 1. If we accept agnosticism, you can't prove anything. 2. If life is really but a dream, then we should still live it like it is reality. 3. Empirical evidence is not logically sound. 4. "Beyond a reasonable doubt" is an unreasonable burden of proof. (The argument I have for this will be...

Voting Period
19 Comments
Updated 4 Years Ago

Global Climate Change is a problem and needs to be addressed.

Toucan_Sam
sadolite

Alright you asked for it. Now lets get started. I am going to make this as easy as possible for you. I am going to lay everything out in a clear-cut manner. I will tell you what is fact and what is speculation. First off we must address climate. Climate definition roughly means the physical properties of the troposphere (thats a layer in the atmosphere) of an area based on analysis of its weather records over a long period of time. The two main factors that determine the climate is temp...

Voting Period
161 Comments
Updated 4 Years Ago

Metaphysics Debate

LR4N6FTW4EVA
Harlan

Okay, I feel like debating metaphysical stuff, but I don't know which, so here are some topics, if you want to go PRO for the topics I list, we can change them to the negative, so as not to confuse anyone. 1. If we accept agnosticism, you can't prove anything. 2. If life is really but a dream, then we should still live it like it is reality. 3. Empirical evidence is not logically sound. 4. "Beyond a reasonable doubt" is an unreasonable burden of proof. (The argument I have for this will be...

Voting Period
15 Comments
Updated 4 Years Ago

Microevolution does not accumulate to Macroevolution

thomas.g
brian_eggleston

Knowing that some small changes can occur thru natural selection does not mean those can accumulate into large body plan changes....

Voting Period
7 Comments
Updated 4 Years Ago

everyone is gonna die!!!

SweetBags
DoubleXMinus

Double had a debate about this, but his opponent forfeited. i think this'll be interesting to debate so i decided to challenge her to it. i'm am advocating that everyone is going to die, and my opponent will be negating this. good luck! :)...

Voting Period
19 Comments
Updated 4 Years Ago

We did not come from monkeys!!

giuocob
joze14rock

Seriosly...how can anyone believe in a theory that says we came from monkeys...that's just ridiculous........

Voting Period
6 Comments
Updated 4 Years Ago

Hydrogen is a cost efective altrnative fuel source, NOT!

sadolite
LakevilleNorthJT

Hydrogen is a cost effective alternative fuel source, NOT! http://mb-soft.com/public2/hydrogen.html...

Voting Period
6 Comments
Updated 4 Years Ago

Politicians and Environmentalists who say hydrogen will be a cost effective fuel source are lying.

sadolite
LakevilleNorthJT

It is a fact that Hydrogen will not be a cost effective alternative to gasoline to power cars and trucks for at least 50 to 100 years. Politicians like Arnold Swartchenegger are wasting billions of taxpayer dollars on something that is a complete boondoggle and a waste of time. I provide the sources below to explain in detail how hydrogen is made and stored along with all of the limitations that go with hydrogen. I have but one rule in this debate if you accept. You can not dismiss these sourc...

Voting Period
15 Comments
Updated 4 Years Ago

We should take action against Global Warming

Derek.Gunn
HandsOff

There is clear evidence that the world is warming. There is no reason to believe it won't continue warming. This will be disastrous for many people and other species in the world. Therefore it is hypocritical and unethical not to act against it....

Voting Period
140 Comments
Updated 4 Years Ago

Topic X (25 CHARACTERS)

sadolite
brittwaller

I challenge anyone to give the the name of "one" let alone a 100 scientist who will put their reputations on the line and state categorically that "global warming" is caused by man. I fully expect samantics will be the only rebuttal to this question in order to avoid answering the substance of the question....

Voting Period
20 Comments
Updated 4 Years Ago