after all, you are just a Christian
wolfman4711 So you gave us a tie on sources did you"LOL! The irony that Con"s positions has NONE"but after all, you are just a Christian. Smirk" : ) Perhaps you would like to enter into a debate of what counts as a valid source....
the roman catholic church has never contradicted itself
in this debate, i am not counting the issues of limbo, or "no salvation outside the catholic church". you would think if the catholic church were not true, that it would have contradicted itself at some point in two thousand years. the only things that count are statements that are authoritative, things that could be considerted "infallible". the pope, intentionally, teaches, the church, on faith and morals. that is the criteria. it includes many councils and other statements by popes....
God cannot be disproven
Burden of proof is on the person trying to disprove God's existence. I am defending the Deistic God....
The Ontological Argument proves that God exists!
My opponent takes the position that the Ontological Argument is proof for the existence of God and assumes the burden of proof. I will assume the Con position. Rounds will work as follows: R1. Acceptance and state Ontological Argument. R2. Arguments and rebuttals. R3. Arguments and rebuttals. R4. Rebuttals and conclusion....
The Earth was Created for Man
I intend to prove that the conditions of the earth are the result of random chance, not divine plan....
mocking religion is acceptable
I personally don't believe that it is acceptable to mock religion on a personal level, because people are entitled to believe whatever they like. I think that when religion becomes involved in wider issues such as education and politics, mockery should be shunned in favour of reasonable debate....
Gay Marriage
Yes gay marriage may be a sin but I'm not against it I'm a Christian but look at all the other sins that are legal religion needs to stay out of the constitution....
the catholic church has never contradicted itself
in this debate, i am not counting the issues of limbo, or "no salvation outside the catholic church". you would think if the catholic church were not true, that it would have contradicted itself at some point in two thousand years. the only things that count are statements that are authoritative, things that could be considerted "infallible". the pope, intentionally, teaches, the church, on faith and morals. that is the criteria. it includes many councils and other statements by popes....
roman catholic church has never contradicted itself
in this debate, i am not counting the issues of limbo, or "no salvation outside the catholic church". you would think if the catholic church were not true, that it would have contradicted itself at some point in two thousand years. the only things that count are statements that are authoritative, things that could be considerted "infallible". the pope, intentionally, teaches, the church, on faith and morals. that is the criteria. it includes many councils and other statements by popes....
catholic church has never contradicted itself
in this debate, i am not counting the issues of limbo, or "no salvation outside the catholic church". you would think if the catholic church were not true, that it would have contradicted itself at some point in two thousand years. the only things that count are statements that are authoritative, things that could be considerted "infallible". the pope, intentionally, teaches, the church, on faith and morals. that is the criteria. it includes many councils and other statements by popes....