Religion Debates

Sort By:
Showing: 111 - 120

Sina's Challenge


(Debate currently impossible to accept, comment or PM me if you're interested). This resolution needs some explaining, so before I go into the rules, here's how the debate works. Anti-Islamic Activist Ali Sina pledged to give away 50k S Dollars to anyone that can disprove that Muhammad (pbuh) was among the following charges: -a narcissist -a misogynist -a rapist -a pedophile -a lecher -a torturer -a mass murderer -a cult leader -an assassin -a terrorist -a mad man -a l...

Post Voting Period
Updated 1 Year Ago

Creationism is false.


Introduction:As a disclaimer, I do not think that evolutionary creationism can be proved to be false. Since there are multiple types of creationism and the focus of this debate is only one type of creationism, I will define the term creationism for this debate. Definitions:Creationism: The belief that the world was created as described in Genesis, in the...

Post Voting Period
Updated 3 Months Ago

Is God Real?


The burden of proof is upon my contender, but I shall point out how there is literally no evidence for the existence of any God and how evolution is fact. Provide evidence as necessary and I will make my rebuttal. Thank you to the participants....

Debating Period
Updated 9 Months Ago

Christianity vs Islam


I will be arguing that Jesus was divine and the Muhammad is not a prophet. I will allow my opponent to make his or her case against my position then I will respond to his or her objections. I pray for a fruitful dialogue ....

Debating Period
Updated 6 Months Ago

Convert Me


Though the instigator normally bears the burden of proof by taking this debate my opponent accepts the burden of proof. The Rules. 1: My opponent as Pro is to make a case for the truth of their religion. 2: I as Con am to critically examine this case and attempt to test it to destruction. 3: Pro's case must consist of one or more of the following. An argument of logic/science, a test or experiment that can be recreated or performed by a non-believer or actual physical evidence (scientific...

Post Voting Period
Updated 7 Years Ago

There is no logical or proveable conclusion to the origins of the universe through religion.


I would like to debate that religion provides no logical or provable stance to the origins of mankind or the universe. I believe that the best explanation comes from science, because it is based on proven facts and sound, logical reasoning. Con will take the side that religion does offer a reasonable explanation to the origins of mankind. Con may choose from any well known religion, such as Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism, etc. As long as the ideas stem form...

Post Voting Period
Updated 9 Months Ago

The Words"Under God" Should be Removed from the Pledge of Allegiance


"No child should go to school each day to have the class declare that her religious beliefs are wrong in an exercise that portrays her and her family as less patriotic than believers." -David Niose, president of the American Humanist Association Back then, we were a nation full of white and Christian people, we were that same nation who added "under God" to show that we were different from the Soviet Union. But now, it is not the same. America is a changing country; a melting pot of peo...

Post Voting Period
Updated 1 Year Ago

Religion is good or bad for society


The argument will be over whether religion is good or bad for society, whether it hurts or benefits civilization. My opponent may choose which side he/she would like to argue....

Debating Period
Updated 10 Months Ago

God as a Biblical Figure is Evil


God, as a figure in the Bible, is clearly an evil figure by any reasonable form of morality. This is a figure that genocides entire people, a figure that created man knowing they would sin and setting it up so they would fail, supports slavery and supports the killing of people for minor offenses that aren't even wrong like gay sex. This is a figure who is clearly evil. To begin, he is a mass murderer. Many a time, God has wiped out entire people. The whole world during the time of Noah, the...

Post Voting Period
Updated 1 Year Ago

Biblical Creationism is Incorrect


Biblical Creationism is false. It has effectively no scientific backing, multiple contradictions, and moreover is not found in the Bible. Rounds: 1st: Acceptance only. 2nd: Opening arguments only. 3rd: Both rebuttals and new arguments. 4th: Rebuttals only. 5th: Summaries only....

Post Voting Period
Updated 3 Years Ago