Philosophy Debates

 
Sort By:
Showing: 111 - 120

You are in a rewarding but challenging relationship, do you choose to wipe out the bad memories?

Daimvad
The_Scapegoat_bleats

Full Proposition: You are 26 years old and in a rewarding but challenging relationship with your significant other of 3 years. You fight a little more than the average couple but are in love with each other despite the sometimes tense & hostile environments. Given that you have the ability to wipe your memory of the bad parts of your relationship never to arise again, do you choose to do so? The opposition can choose to defend either side and I will then argue against the side my opposition h...

Post Voting Period
5 Comments
Updated 4 Weeks Ago

Who is more evil, Hitler or Stalin?

IAlwaysLoseDebates
RickyMT

I would like to challenge RickyMT to a debate of who is more evil, Hitler or Stalin? I will be on the side that says Hitler is more evil mainly because of a previous debate the my opponent had with another debater claiming Hitler did nothing wrong. This round will be acceptance, with another round to state your position and the third round will be rebuttal....

Post Voting Period
1 Comments
Updated 4 Weeks Ago

Vegan/Animal Rights

jhenley9111
Drewbater

I will argue PRO for this topic. I would like CON to go first. Best of luck!...

Post Voting Period
5 Comments
Updated 1 Month Ago

Wrong doings are created by good intentions

lanscaper11234
iaminneedofhelp

Hey guys, this is my first time creating an argument here so bear with me if I'm not really that good with this. I am proposing a debate. A debate which is somewhat trivial but interesting. I agree with the idea that wrong doings are mostly created with the intention of being good/ doing something good. so yeah, if anybody is interested , you're more than welcome to rebuke my statement....

Voting Period
1 Comments
Updated 1 Month Ago

People with Intolerable Views Should Not Allowed to Present their Intolerable Statements in Public.

Manmit
dit731

People can have intolerable Views. They can lead to something good such as a country can become independent, such as what Gandhi did, or it can lead to racism and even suicide when people present mean views against others. Please debate and vote on what you think. I am against this idea. I think people should be allowed to present their views no matter what. See if you can defeat me....

Post Voting Period
1 Comments
Updated 1 Month Ago

Abortion is generally immoral

zmikecuber
Zarroette

Resolved: Abortion is generally immoral.Four rounds. Shared BoP. No new arguments in R4. R1 for acceptance.I shall argue that abortion is immoral in most cases. This means excluding extraordinary cases such as rape, incest, to save the life of the mother, etc. So I shall be arguing that in cases where the individual gave consent and partook in sex, resulting in a pregnancy, abortion is immoral. My opponent shall a...

Post Voting Period
112 Comments
Updated 1 Month Ago

Hitler was a Fascist

Jifpop09
Tophatdoc

Me and Tophatdoc have been arguing over whether Hitler was a fascist or not, so I figure I will challenge him to a debate. Its what I learned my whole life, and in all my textbooks, so we'll see. Anyways, we will go by the wikipedia definition, which for the benefit of my opponent, will exclude the fact that it directly states hitler was a fascist.

6 Comments
Updated 1 Month Ago

Nations would benifit from using Tridemism as their political philosophy

Jifpop09
Jevinigh

Tridemism is a political philosophy designed by Sun Yat Sen, but in America, it is very similar to Progressivism. It promotes 3 main beliefs known as the principles of the people.1. Nationalism2. Democracy 3. Welfare of the people (Socio-capitalism)It calls for the three main pushes in the American Progressive era1. Official Recall

Post Voting Period
15 Comments
Updated 1 Month Ago

DDO Olympics Philosophy and Morals: Round 2

Lucky_Luciano
Romanii

Resolved: The Leibnizian Cosmological Argument is Sound.Rounds:1. Presentation of the LCA/Initial Refutation2. Clash3. Weighing/ClashNo new arguments should be presented in round 3 unless in direct response to a new argument presented in round 2.God is defined as the necessary, personal first cause of the universe.We should rationally accept an argument as sound...

Post Voting Period
41 Comments
Updated 1 Month Ago

An omnipotent metaphysical god cannot exist

alexlazar
GarretKadeDupre

I will argue that "an omnipotent metaphysical god cannot exist". Con will try to refute my arguments, but is welcome to also provide an argument to show that this is indeed possible and plausible. My argument is based on the fact that an entity cannot be both metaphysical and omnipotent in the same time. Con does not have to be a believer. It could also be an atheist that explores the possibility that such a god exists. I looked up some definitions and they are all limited in a sense so...

Post Voting Period
4 Comments
Updated 1 Month Ago