Philosophy Debates

 
Sort By:
Showing: 111 - 120

Are zombies better than vampires

Madgirl707
Wylted

I refuse to believe that zombies are better than vampires because there are no upsides to being a zombie. A zombie is slow and dumb without a brain. They are easily tricked where as vampires are quick, strong and have super reflexes....

Post Voting Period
3 Comments
Updated 3 Weeks Ago

which is better vampires or werewolves

Madgirl707
AimeeGleek17

I believe vampires are deffently the best because they are creatures of the night and are able to use their powers painlessly at any time however werewolves only turn on a full moon and when they do turn it is painful and they can not control their selfs whilst in wolf form, which normally ends up with them going on a killing spree. Vampires on the other hand can learn to control themselves against the thirst for blood....

Post Voting Period
0 Comments
Updated 3 Weeks Ago

Atheism Has No Burden of Proof

Double_R
Dragonfang

BoP is on myself as Pro and Instigator to prove the resolution. My BoP requirement is to demonstrate that my case is rationally justified despite Cons rebuttals. The definition of Burden of Proof and Atheism are subject to debate. First round is for acceptance only. No new arguments in round 4. All other standard debate rules apply....

Post Voting Period
20 Comments
Updated 3 Weeks Ago

Sweet genious is the wiered sest tv show

ExipredMilkExpiredCows
9spaceking

WATCH IT!!! It is the weirest thing, EVER!...

Post Voting Period
1 Comments
Updated 3 Weeks Ago

Science has rendered theism unreasonable

Jellon
Envisage

There is a chronic tension between agnostics and theists where both sides believe people who believe the other side are unreasonable. I often see names called by both sides. As one who believes both belief systems are reasonable, I intend to defend the position that modern science has not rendered theism unreasonable. To win, Pro must show that modern scientific knowledge provides overwhelming evidence that there does not exist a god. To win, Con must be able to reasonably address all argume...

Post Voting Period
59 Comments
Updated 4 Weeks Ago

Only cowardly, manipulative scum reject comments.

Max.Wallace
JPat05

Most big self proclaimed judges do not accept comments from the peanut gallery here as they are all knowing, and commentators are numbskulls in their mind. Grow up and take your medicine, the words of the crowd. Only a succubus accepts no comments, as they feel they are irresistable....

Post Voting Period
1 Comments
Updated 4 Weeks Ago

Objective Moral Judgements can be made in Moral Nihilism

Envisage
xXCryptoXx

*Leave a message if you want to accept this debate*Details:I have been thinking for a while how to word this resolution, which is my own position in terms of moral philosophy. I am a Nihilist, and I think it's a rational starting position for making moral judgements. For example, I will make the claim the holocaust was wrong, and I make that as an intended objective statement. The BoP is on me to demons...

Post Voting Period
49 Comments
Updated 4 Weeks Ago

Absolute truth is the absolute truth.

Atmas
TheatreVirus

Absolute truth exists absolutely, regardless of the subjective nature of experience. The key here is the difference between what we consider facts and what we consider truth. Facts are conditional and changeable due to entropy, but truths, such as how gravity works, are immune to such change. Because such things are immutable, unchangeable, and constant, they are in fact absolute truths. The possible existence of another universe doesn't negate these truths because one could come up with any...

Post Voting Period
6 Comments
Updated 4 Weeks Ago

Are vampires real?

Madgirl707
Isaac77

I believe vampires are real because of the fact that the stories must have been pasted down for years for a reason. The tales of Vampires have been told for centuries, people who have died and Been reborn into blood thirsty hunters. These myths must have come from somewhere. It is almost impossible to fabricate a creature in such detail and have enough people to believe it that people were burned or staked for it as a crime. If the legends are fake then where did they come from? And why do so...

Post Voting Period
4 Comments
Updated 4 Weeks Ago

If you wished for someone to die, and they died are you responsible?

funnycn
Greeny

This is a philosophical debate about murder.Once you accept, your views about murder might change.Here are the rules... Forfeit once and it's automatic loss. No insulting. The bible is a limited source. If you use the bible, it must have a secondary source to back it up. This debate is to be taken seriously. No trolling, no nonsense, and I have no tolerance for it. Round one is acceptance. Round five is the conclusion. Murder is defined as "The crime of deliberately killing a person". [...

Post Voting Period
9 Comments
Updated 4 Weeks Ago