Science Debates

 
Sort By:
Showing: 121 - 130

evolution is noticably weak when it comes to the origin of life.

cheyennebodie
Elijahhill97

I have yet heard any one from the anti-creation side give a plausible account of the origin of life. This will be an open debate for all ....

Post Voting Period
45 Comments
Updated 2 Months Ago

Evolution is most likely true

MyWoodenHeart
BecauseCheetahs

This round is stricly for acceptance. I believe that evolution is most likely true....

Post Voting Period
20 Comments
Updated 1 Month Ago

The necessity of detoxing.

DanK
intellectuallyprimitive

Claims regarding the need to rid your body of toxins are found in nearly every corner of the internet, as well as other media sources and many natural healers. Generally the claim is something to the effect of this; Your body builds up and stores toxins, and they are potentially harmful less they be flushed out. While some may see this as a good health practice, I remain unconvinced that this is anything more than snake oil. If you believe you can convince me otherwise, and do so in a civilize...

Post Voting Period
2 Comments
Updated 1 Month Ago

All CO2 emissions should cease immediatley, to save the planet.

Max.Wallace
Ozzyhead

CO2 is killing the planet, all breathing things, except those that know this, should stop or do less of it right now, to save the planet for those that know this. That is the global warmists, (er,... climate changologists?) status quo, and you will better off if you are one of they, for reasons of self esteem, the greatest drug ever!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!...

Post Voting Period
9 Comments
Updated 2 Months Ago

Evolution

Nathan.apologetics
jh1234lnew

The belief in evolution is a remarkable phenomenon. It is a hypothesis that is defended by the scientific community with a fiery passion, despite macro-evolution's (evolution from one distinct kind of organism into another) contradictions with several key scientific Laws. The origins, insufficiency of substantial evidence and the inconsistencies of evolutionary dogma will be outlined in this debate. Evolution is a hypothesis that contradicts physics,biology,the fossil record and common sense....

Post Voting Period
37 Comments
Updated 1 Month Ago

Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Commercial Testing?

Animalana
a_mysterious_stranger

Animal testing should not be used. For one, scientists still test it on humans anyways. Two, animals have a different anatomy when compared to humans, causing their result to be different from that of a human. Animal testing is cruelty to animals, yet scientists get away with it. The Animal Welfare Act allows animals to be burned, shocked, poisoned, isolated, starved, forcibly restrained, addicted to drugs, and brain-damaged. No experiment is prohibited, and painkillers aren't required. Even if...

Post Voting Period
1 Comments
Updated 2 Months Ago

People Saw Living Dinosaurs

GarretKadeDupre
Truth_seeker

I will argue that people saw living dinosaurs. I am using the colloquial definition of dinosaur. I welcome Truth_seeker to my debate. I'll post my opening arguments in round 2....

Voting Period
20 Comments
Updated 2 Months Ago

the benefits of being a throw-away society outweighs the costs to society and the environment

hc4ever
wxyz2000

As you know, the resolution is as follows: the benefits of being a throw-away society outweighs the costs to society and the environment. We model this resolution as follows: the scope would be for the people using the devices and the companies. Our goal is to have further development in society and make sure there"s less pollution, and no chaos. We have three constructive arguments to show why this resolution is true and should pass. Mr. Speaker, our first point is that new devices and uses o...

Post Voting Period
1 Comments
Updated 2 Months Ago

Animal Testing

woojin05
Zaradi

Topic: Animal Testing Debate Stipulations:Round 1: Pro presents arguments and caseRound 2: Con presents arguments and casePro refutationRound 3:Con refutationPro willingly "PASSES" on this roundPlease comment in the comments section if you would like to ask questions or accept t...

Post Voting Period
6 Comments
Updated 2 Months Ago

Super Tiny Debate (STD) #1: Are Nuclear Bombs Necessary For Warfare?

RevL8ion
Cermank

Yes, I am aware of the the acronym of Super Tiny Debate, and I decided to keep it in the title because it was partially amusing. Anyway, first round is acceptance only. Con must prove that nukes are necessary in war in a minimum of 500 characters over 5 rounds. In return, I must prove that nuclear bombs are unnecessary in a war. Sources are unnecessary for this STD (XD). Only 24 hours are given for each round. No trolling allowed.

Post Voting Period
14 Comments
Updated 2 Months Ago