Philosophy Debates

 
Filter By:
Showing: 141 - 150

this argument proves that people cant travel back in time

induced
Mr.Pirate

i believe that the argument below is proof that people cant travel back in time. CONs goal is to find an irreconcilable logical hole in my argument. give your rebuttals in the 1st round. state every point that you would disagree with and why.
===========================================
consider this scenario:
P1. Bob's son is named Fry
P2. Fry traveled back in time
P3. Fry killed Bob, resulting in Bob never having a son

based on P3, Bob never has a son, b...

Post Voting Period
1 Comments
Updated 2 Months Ago

a subjective moralist saying "X is immoral" is like me saying "the blue M&M is green"

induced
Stephen_Hawkins

when subjective moralists say "rape is immoral", all they mean is "i dislike rape" or "society dislikes rape" or something along those lines. this is like if i defined the word "green" to mean "a color that i like", and therefore i could hold up a blue M&M and say "this is green". it is very misleading to use that kind of terminology because the statement "X is Y" doesnt have any kind of subjective pronoun like "i" or "you". why dont you just call a spade a spade? if you dont like rape,...

Post Voting Period
15 Comments
Updated 2 Months Ago

Should Socrates have drank the hemlock?

Corsettoe
tdurk

I believe that Socrates should have drank the hemlock to end his life. Do you agree?...

Post Voting Period
0 Comments
Updated 2 Months Ago

Should have Socrates Drank the Hemlock

Jaygee
moliveira8264

In Hume's "On Suicide," Humes states "But the life of a man is of no greater importance to the universe than that of an oyster." Socrates should drink the hemlock because his death will not disrupt life. His death will not be of great importance to many since he has been already labeled as some one who has corrupted the youth. Also, he should drink the hemlock because his demon told him to. Therefore he committing suicide is what god wanted him to....

Post Voting Period
0 Comments
Updated 2 Months Ago

Socrates should have drank the Hemlock.

Williamsantos
stevenac4

Socrates indeed should have drank the Hemlock. Socrates believed in living justly and honorably. In his perspective to live well was to live honorably and justly. Hence, the decision to drink the Hemlock. To not follow through with his unwritten agreement with the Athenians would have been equally unjust as running away without Athenian consent. With that being said, Socrates whom is not afraid of death, in fact desires death to free his spirit from his body which he believed to be the prison of...

Post Voting Period
0 Comments
Updated 2 Months Ago

Atheism vs. Christianity

DoubtingDave
Muted

Thank you muted for accepting this debate.

Resolved: Atheism is more probable than Christianity.

For purposes of this debate, we will be taking a literalistic approach to the Bible and will be using a Calvanistic doctrine of the Bible.

If my opponent disagrees or would like to add any clarifications, please do so in round 1.

Rules:

(1) Debater must have typing experience and internet a...

Post Voting Period
189 Comments
Updated 2 Months Ago

The ends justify the means

dylancatlow
TrasguTravieso

In this debate, I will be arguing that the ends justify the means while my opponent will be arguing that the ends don't necessarily justify the means.

Definition of 'The ends justify the means' : "A
Post Voting Period
43 Comments
Updated 2 Months Ago

This House Believes That the No Difference Theory is correct

Stephen_Hawkins
16kadams

Hello, and welcome to my next debate. 16kadams, probably one of the most formidable and respected debaters on this site for conservative beliefs against myself, it certainly shall be an interesting debate.

===Opening Jokes===

'My Dad used to say 'always fight fire with fire', which is probably why he got thrown out of the fire brigade.'


===Definitions===

No difference theory: The rejection of necessary differe...

Post Voting Period
32 Comments
Updated 2 Months Ago

CIIR's Argument for Morality is Valid

Typhlochactas
CIIReligion

Ave. This debate will be centered around the 'Argument for Morality' as stated by CIIR. This argument has two premises and a conclusion. P1: Morals come from experience. P2: Common sense comes with experience. C: Morality is common sense. The first round of this debate is for acceptance. The next four rounds will be constant debating. General rules of conduct should be followed. Vale....

Post Voting Period
66 Comments
Updated 3 Months Ago

The Ontological Argument is a sound argument for God's existence.

KeytarHero
Typhlochactas

I wish to thank Con for taking up this challenge. We will debating the proposition "The Ontological Argument is a sound argument for God's existence." The formulation of the OA I will be defending is as follows:

P1: It is possible that a maximally great being exists.
P2: If it is possible that a maximally great being exists, then a maximally great being exists in some possible world.
P3: If a maximally great being ex...

Post Voting Period
18 Comments
Updated 2 Months Ago