Debates

 
Sort By:
Showing: 141 - 150

Who will get the most votes?

JimShady
Emilrose

Hello. This is a debate to see who will get more votes. There is nothing to debate about, we will just see who can get the most votes, and whoever does wins. So I guess good luck. To voters: vote for whoever you feel like. To challenger: all you gotta do is accept! Once again good luck!...

Voting Period
32 Comments
Updated 1 Month Ago

That guns should be banned in America

ittrlitjfcialsnefr
qwzx

Hello, I will be affirming the topic that guns should be banned in America. I would like an opponent who truly believes in the second amendment. First round is to argue (and for my opponent, to respond to my arguments), second round is to respond to the opponent's arguments (no new content please). Where do I begin? Guns: I think it is safe to define a gun as a device that can kill a living human with minimal possible difficulty. My model for this ban, would be, to phase in my policy over th...

Voting Period
14 Comments
Updated 1 Month Ago

the US should preemptively attack n korea

dairygirl4u2c
Nd2400

the US should preemptively attack north korea it's inevitable that they will eventually perfect their rocket technology and get more nukes. we should strike sooner than later because it's better than waiting till they have more power and leverage, as they are not fit to have hundreds of nukes and be able to take the world hostage. it would cause one of the worst humanitarian problems ever, but it's better than losing LA and NY to nukes....

Voting Period
0 Comments
Updated 1 Month Ago

The United States should not have any laws limiting access to guns.

platoandaristotle
TheMarketLibertarian

I argue for gun control(ie requiring a license to own a gun), Pro argues for the motionSeveral studies show that pro-gun legislation increases crime.Open carry laws increase crime - http://feeds.latimes.com/~r/latimes/news/local/politics/cal/~3/NrpkM5P-1TM/la-ol-patt-morrison-asks-john-donohue-guns-20170802-htmlstory.html

Voting Period
9 Comments
Updated 1 Month Ago

The god of the bible is categorically, unconditionally, and conclusively evil

backwardseden
Rightreform

The god of the bible has freely admitted that he is evil on numerous occasions, so why should anybody believe in him? Actually the better question is, is why would anybody "want" to believe in him? The question is yours to answer if you wish. In this debate it will be proved that god according to the bible has freely admitted that he is evil,...

Voting Period
14 Comments
Updated 1 Month Ago

Atriox vs Master Chief

Atriox
AveryGaleson

I am open for anyone to debate against me. I am taking the side of the Banished Brute Warlord leader Atriox. Please put you're first argument as you're acceptance...

Voting Period
0 Comments
Updated 1 Month Ago

Proof of God Via Observation

Purushadasa
BrettBoelkens

The fact that the believer in atheist Dogma is unable to observe God at this particular moment in time proves nothing about God's factual existence or about His factual characteristics -- it only proves that the believer in atheist Dogma's chosen method for observing God is inferior to that of the innumerable Theists, who have indeed observed God and His factual characteristics. Your inability to observe any particular person does not prove that the other person somehow does not exist, an...

Voting Period
23 Comments
Updated 1 Month Ago

evo THEORY is a Biologically Impossible Myth

Purushadasa
NOLIENOGAIN

Preamble: evo THEORY is nothing but a biologically impossible myth that has never happened, is not happening now, and shall never happen in the future. Prove me wrong and win $5,000.00 by watching this short video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=15XBCJj_Itw Formal Argument: evo THEORY is nothing but a biologically impossible myth. P1: Without actual observation of concrete and successful inter-species propagation, evo THEORY cannot be anything but a biologically impossible myth....

Voting Period
8 Comments
Updated 1 Month Ago

Baby-killers (AKA "Abortionists") Deserve the Death Penalty

Purushadasa
Dunndee

DEATH PENALTY FOR BABY-KILLERS: Why do individuals that kill babies in their mothers' wombs deserve the death penalty? There are many factors involved in all violent crimes, and a fewR03; of the most important are: -- the vulnerability of the victim -- the age of the victim -- the innocence of the victim, and -- the degree of violence In most cases, the more vulnerable the victim of a violent crime, the harsher the sentence. For example, physically assaulting someone who is...

Voting Period
31 Comments
Updated 1 Month Ago

Children Are Born in Ignorance -- Believers in atheist Dogma Remain So, Unto Death

Purushadasa
Bluepaintcan123

Human and animal babies are born in ignorance: They can't control their bowel movements, they can't tie their shoes, they can't communicate with human language, and they don't know any facts about God. As human babies of normal intelligence grow and mature, they learn all of these things from more mature, wiser, intelligent human beings. The believer in atheist Dogma resists this human education process, and remains on the exact same intellectual platform as the messy-diapered babies and t...

Voting Period
24 Comments
Updated 1 Month Ago